The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures

Menino's 50-Percent Solution

The incumbent mayor is going to cruise through the upcoming preliminary. So why does his campaign seem to be taking it so seriously?
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  September 11, 2009


We are finally learning what a "real" electoral challenge would look like for Mayor Tom Menino. For years, many in Boston (including here at the Phoenix) have lamented the absence of a vigorous campaign that would force the long-time incumbent to defend his record and discuss the issues. After a relatively sleepy spring and summer, that process began this past week with the first two mayoral debates: one broadcast on WBZ-TV (and WBZ-AM 1030) and one hosted by a coalition of advocacy groups in Roxbury.

The latter event, though witnessed only by the 600 or so in attendance, said much about the seriousness Menino is dedicating to this year's election, the fifth defense of his title since inheriting it in 1993. He accepted the invitation at the eleventh hour, despite previously indicating he would limit himself to select forums he had previously agreed to attend — and despite insinuations from his camp that the coalition's lead sponsor, MassVote, was not competent to host an event worthy of the mayor's participation.

Most important, the debate placed Menino in a position to which he has rarely subjected himself: public disapproval. The live audience, mostly comprised of voters already committed to a candidate, didn't go so far as to boo the mayor, but frequently gave rousing applause to the criticism heaped upon him by his challengers, despite instructions to remain silent.

The fact that Menino chose to show up at the MassVote forum is one of several indicators he is concerned about the campaign — which is particularly striking, because conventional wisdom says he has little to worry about in the preliminary election coming up on September 22. That preliminary will narrow the race to two candidates, one of whom undoubtedly will be Menino.

So why did he add the MassVote forum to his schedule, as well as other events this month where he'll deign to share the stage with opponents Michael Flaherty, Kevin McCrea, and Sam Yoon? And why has he dug into his campaign war chest to launch an ad blitz for the final two weeks leading up to a preliminary that everyone knows he is going to win?

The answer lies in the political-expectation game.

Behind the scenes, in the electoral trenches, there is a growing belief that, should Menino receive more than 50 percent of the vote on September 22 — a majority, beating all the other candidates combined — the city will hit the snooze button and sleep through the rest of the campaign season, allowing Menino to coast to victory.

If Menino's tally falls below 50 percent — that is, if more people vote against him than for him — these same strategists think the city could awaken on September 23 believing, for the first time, that an incumbent Menino could potentially lose. That could change the entire dynamic of the race, as his suddenly viable opponent receives a wave of media attention, contributions, volunteers, and buzz.

The difference of percentage points might amount to only 1000 votes or fewer, but the psychological effect could be huge. Although Menino and his advisors won't say so on the record, they want 51 percent badly — and they're not sure they're going to get it. That's why the mayor is out there, at least for now, giving the city the public debates it has wanted for so long.

Unrealistic numbers
The 50-percent target is, frankly, a little unfair to the mayor. In a multi-candidate field, it's tough to achieve, even for a popular incumbent. Consider that Kevin White got 42 percent in the 1979 preliminary, on his way to easily winning his fourth term as Boston's mayor.

Plus, preliminary turnout is not necessarily a good predictor of the behavior of November general-election voters. For one thing, not every anti-Menino voter in the preliminary will be one in the final. For another, supporters of Flaherty and Yoon are highly motivated to get to the polls in the preliminary, to help their favored candidate survive to the final ballot.

The race is more of a formality for Menino supporters. So, there's no real reason to think the mayor should be less likely to win were he to get just under half the preliminary votes, rather than just more than half. But expectations drive reality in politics. And expectations for Menino are staggeringly high.

One reason for that is the absence of polling that might set a more realistic baseline. Only a single public poll on the race has been conducted all year — and that one, by the Boston Globe back in May, asked how challengers would fare head-to-head against Menino, not what would happen in a multi-candidate vote. (It also polled from all Boston adults, rather than "likely voters" or registered voters; that broader pool is less likely to be familiar with City Councilors Flaherty and Yoon.)

The impression given by that Globe poll was of an inevitable rout. It showed Menino with a stunning 73 percent approval rating. In those head-to-head match-ups, Menino beat Flaherty 61-23, Yoon 63-21, and McCrea 70-7.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Election Campaigns, Elections and Voting, Politics,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Re: Menino's 50-Percent Solution
Interesting analysis...but that's about all it is.  You'd do well to actually listen to the people you interviewed, rather than making assumptions about the strategy of any of the campaigns. Their ad blitz has been planned for a long time, and the adding of the MassVote forum was only because all the challengers were also attending. Is Menino really going to let the three challengers take a stage and go on a hour long Menino bashing spreee? Of course not.  Does Menino want a good preformance in the Prelim to solidify his preformance in general? Yes. Is his strategy at all reactionary? No.
By JayAltschuler on 09/10/2009 at 10:39:51

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   SIX FOR THE SEAT  |  September 16, 2009
    Over the next few months, as candidates for the US Senate travel the state, you're likely to hear them say again and again that nobody can ever truly replace Ted Kennedy. That's the truth. But what does the state want next, after such a legendary, larger-than-life figure?
  •   MENINO'S 50-PERCENT SOLUTION  |  September 11, 2009
    For years, many in Boston (including here at the Phoenix ) have lamented the absence of a vigorous campaign that would force the long-time incumbent to defend his record and discuss the issues.
  •   GIANT SHADOW  |  September 02, 2009
    One striking aspect of the Kennedy tributes was the focus on the help he and his office provided for ordinary individuals in Massachusetts — all those things that fall under the category of "constituent services."
  •   AFTER TED  |  August 26, 2009
    The death of Senator Edward M. Kennedy early Wednesday morning brings to a close the life and legendary career of one of Massachusetts's greatest political figures.
  •   YOON OR FLAHERTY  |  August 20, 2009
    Boston voters will go to the polls in less than seven weeks to choose two candidates, out of the four now running, to face off against each other in November's mayoral election.

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group