The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures

Pope Benedict recently lifted the excommunication of four bishops who had been consecrated without the required Vatican consent. All four are also members of the Society of St. Pius X, which some observers feel holds anti-Semitic views. One, Bishop Richard Williamson, has widely proclaimed his belief that no Jews were gassed in Nazi concentration camps.

(A few days after this announcement the Vatican clarified that Williamson will have to recant his anti-Semitic views, of which the pope was said to be "unaware." Williams has refused.)

The "automatic" excommunications each of these men incurred came through self-destructing violations as cited in Canons 1378, 1382 and 1398 of the Church's code.

"Crimes" punishable by automatic banishment from the church include:

1) Inappropriate consecration of a bishop;

2) Desecration of the Eucharist;

3) Killing the Pope;

4) Procuring an abortion.

In 1985, the Bishop of Providence publicly threw me out (or said I had removed myself) because of my work as the then-executive director of Planned Parenthood of Rhode Island and its abortion clinic. Even as those events fade, I cannot help but ponder the logic of undoing the sanctions against these four bishops.

Does Rome's new leniency signal a softening? Or do these four fellow clergy — heads of a group of 1.5 million renegade Catholics around the globe who may threaten Pope Benedict's ultimate authority — account for the Vatican turning the other cheek? If the pope didn't know all the facts, what is he doing?

It is doubtful an assassin of any pope or anyone disrespectful enough to desecrate the Eucharist — "the Body and Blood of Christ" in Catholic teaching — would be treated as gingerly by the curia

Certainly, anyone "procuring" an abortion — even the administrator of the clinic — is unlikely to receive Rome's pardon. Indeed, Boston's Bishop Sean O'Malley, on his blog, supported the pope's embracing of the four bishops as an act promoting "unity and reconciliation," while chastising President Obama for his pro-choice views.

Such reasoning concludes that bishops who publicly dismiss the slaughter of six million human beings — not fetuses, but actual living, breathing, documented men, women and children — can be forgiven. Bishops who say that the gassing of these millions did not happen are apparently innocent, despite evidence in diaries, books, scholarly research, and Nuremberg confessions to the contrary. Those who assist a woman in making a decision to abort a pregnancy at seven weeks toward gestation, conversely, remain unworthy of Rome's compassion.

In embracing one group of offenders, Pope Benedict and Bishop O'Malley reinforce Rome's message to Catholics of late: that Church rules and even God's law apply to those in the pews, while those on the altar may openly sin without consequence.

If life is precious, it is always precious. If we must respect life, we must respect all human lives. If all people are God's children, that includes Jews as well as Christians, women as well as men, and laity as well as clergy.

More that 1.5 million Catholics have probably left the Church because of Rome's hypocrisy and arrogance. We've yet to see movement to "unite" and "reconcile" with them.

Related: , , , More more >
  Topics: News Features , Barack Obama, Culture and Lifestyle, Religion,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Re: The problem with the Church's selective embrace
Mary Ann Sorrentino, you are so evil it should make people shudder. You are a murderer, a butcherer of human life. For you to say that that babies (or as you decide to call them, fetuses) are not living humans is proved false by the fact that you and others make lots of money killing them. If they were not alive, you would not need to do so. Sorry to interrupt your warped logic with common sense, but somebody has to.   
By StPaul on 07/15/2009 at 3:53:40
Re: The problem with the Church's selective embrace
Sounds like abortion czar Mary Ann Sorrentino wants to 'selectively' choose with commandments to follow. Obviously "Thou Shall Not Kill" does not make her list. St. Paul is right. A 'fetus' is a human being every bit as much as you and I - they are merely in their earlier stages of development. You and I all went through the same journey, too, which begins at conception.  Babies in the womb are human beings fully equipped with their own unique DNA, fingerprints, and heartbeat.
By Joan47 on 07/22/2009 at 4:31:10

Share this entry with Delicious
    Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, the last "lion" of the Massachusetts clan, finally rests – in peace, I hope.
  •   JUDGING THE JUDGE  |  June 03, 2009
    Women may not yet have full equality, but Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the US Supreme Court proves we can compete with the big guys now. It also means that women accepting patronage (and every political appointment is patronage) have an equal shot at getting pounded in the process.
  •   RECESSION LESSON  |  May 20, 2009
    Cigarette tax hikes in Rhode Island have smokers kicking the habit.
    Politics has seldom made stranger bedfellows than those exposed when the RI ACLU hopped into the sack with former state senator William Irons.
    Pope Benedict recently lifted the excommunication of four bishops who had been consecrated without the required Vatican consent.

 See all articles by: MARY ANN SORRENTINO

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group