The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

BHO's no FDR

Nor should he aspire to be because, trite but true, things are very different now
By STEVEN STARK  |  December 31, 2008


As we enter a new year, a new administration, and indeed a new era, the advice most given to Barack Obama is model your presidency after that of Franklin D. Roosevelt's. Time magazine photoshopped Obama into a cigarette-chomping, bespectacled Roosevelt for its November 25 cover, and columnists Paul Krugman and Joseph Nocera, both of the New York Times, expressed the hope that, in Nocera's words, we'll be seeing "the new FDR."

But if Obama goes down that path, sadly, he will fail. Trite but true: the times are very different. Broad public programs modeled on the New Deal can't work the way they did in the 1930s and '40s, because the economics of the situation have changed. More important, so has the rhetorical power of the presidency.

That doesn't mean Obama is headed for failure. Presidents design their office around what they know — former governors tend to see the position as a "chief executive of the 50 states"; former armed-services officers see it as more organized along military lines. So what does Obama know? Chicago, the American epicenter of political patronage.

In Chicago, the chief executive (the mayor) primarily directs money to other parts of the public sector. In that sense, though he was never mayor, Obama may see himself as the embodiment of "the Chicago way" — with the Windy City (and its mayor's office), for better or worse, as the model for how the federal government ought to work. (That may be particularly apt now, given both that we're in an era when the federal government is dispensing bailouts and how the upcoming stimulus packages are likely to end up being distributed.)

The FDR model of creating vast public-works projects is unattainable. Unlike Obama, Roosevelt didn't have to contend with an immense network of regulatory hurdles — bidding, environmental, and labor — that could take years to clear out of the way before he could launch his initiatives.

This means that, if Obama wants to inject cash and jobs into the economy quickly, he has two choices: he can help the states launch recovery projects already on the drawing boards. Or, he can funnel money to state and local governments that are on the verge of bankruptcy.

The second option shouldn't be underestimated. State and local government now provides around 15 percent of the jobs in America, and 2009 will likely see a number of public-sector employers going broke — most notably, in the state of California. So the federal government is eventually going to have to bail them out, just as it bailed out banks and the auto companies.

That won't make Obama another FDR, but given his Chicago model, it may be a task for which he's ideally suited. Nevertheless, even if he's successful at rescuing floundering state and local governments, Obama still won't have the power to do much to affect the overall national economy.

Communication breakdown
And that's not all that will be out of his reach. Despite his own considerable skills as a rhetorical leader, Obama can't possibly emulate FDR in mobilizing the nation toward a single sustained path, because the lines of communication are different.

Remember that FDR emerged in the early days of radio — the beginning of an era when new networks were creating the first live mass audiences in history. When Roosevelt gave a Fireside Chat, the listenership was huge, if only because there were so few other competing sources of information. And not only that: because the country under FDR was essentially sharing the same few media outlets, radio organized a common culture and a sense of national unity tailor-made for the Roosevelt approach — Big Government for big audiences.

Today, in a media universe comprising 200 cable outlets, thousands of radio stations, and, of course, the Internet, the president's microphone has been reduced to two cupped hands, if that. There is no more bully pulpit. More important, we're in an age of national atomization, where there's much less of a shared political culture. Even with Obama's talent for delivering inspiring speeches, far from everyone will be listening. The converted will hear him; the unconverted or the uninterested will tune him out.

Thanks to all the bailout and stimulus packages, federal power may be growing. But the Constitution was designed to make the presidency a weak office — especially in the area of domestic policy. Transforming a modern economy is beyond any president's reach. That's why Obama, finally, will need all the luck and good will he can muster. Through no fault of his own, he has raised expectations so high that it's hard to see how anyone could fulfill them.

To read the "Presidential Tote Board" blog, go to Steven Stark can be reached at

  • Hope restored
    Barack Obama's election has sparked international wonder. His task, however, is great.
  • Good news, bad news
    Fear and loathing? Or happy days? The only thing we know for sure about the coming year is that we're all in this together.
  • Lou Dobbs in 2012?
    As the GOP implodes, the financial crisis may present a white-hot moment for a third-party voice to enter the fray
  • More more >
  Topics: News Features , Barack Obama , Barack Obama , Chicago ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Re: BHO's no FDR
i am temporarily intrigued by the celebratory exuberance of the so-called 'progressive' media and it's hallelujia with the moderate 'president-elect cool'. at this writing, little if any of the gentleman from illinois campaign postures can be fortified by the team he's surrounded himself with. rejoicing the departure of the renegade right is one thing. fascination with the lap-dance of those currently at the gates is another. the apparent conviction of the incoming posse is that what was said during the campaign should not now be monitored, and that expectations, in this case should be suspended and simply disappear behind clouds of ambition. the latter relegates the campaign of 2008 to a mere souvenier.
By jeffmcnary on 12/30/2008 at 3:16:12

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   BHO'S NO FDR  |  December 31, 2008
    Nor should he aspire to be because, trite but true, things are very different now
  •   MONEY MATTERS  |  December 24, 2008
    Obama's victory was bought and paid for — with change
  •   LOU DOBBS IN 2012?  |  October 16, 2008
    As the GOP implodes, the financial crisis may present a white-hot moment for a third-party voice to enter the fray
  •   HOOVER? DAMN!  |  October 09, 2008
    George W. Bush’s failures may have set off a tectonic shift in US presidential politics, commencing a Democratic Party reign
  •   CAPTAIN CHAOS  |  October 02, 2008
    Steering a suddenly lost GOP ship,

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Thursday, January 01, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group