The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Taxing Catholics

Should the Church lose its exemption?
By EDITORIAL  |  November 18, 2009

Should the Roman Catholic Church, and the various subsidiary groups and organizations that exist under its umbrella and operate at its direction, be entitled to state- and federal-tax exemptions?

A few years ago, only crackpots or militant atheists would raise such a question. But in light of the Catholic Church's high-profile role in repealing same-sex-marriage rights — first in California and now in Maine — that question no longer seems frivolous or marginal.

There is no doubt that the Catholic Church crossed the line that separates constitutionally protected religious instruction from prohibited political advocacy in its Maine fight.

A large and growing Facebook community in that state has now dedicated itself to nullifying the Church's tax-exempt status. The leading same-sex marriage defense group there is also urging citizens to file complaints with the Internal Revenue Service.

It would be fitting indeed if the patriarchal and authoritarian Church fathers were called to atone by those more traditionally minded Mainers who believe in the separation of church and state mandated by the Constitution. It is also welcoming to see that at least some in Congress are recoiling from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' (USCCB) pernicious intervention in the national health-care-reform debate.

A recent statement by Democratic congresswoman Lynn Woolsey of California states the case clearly:

The role the bishops played in pushing the Stupak amendment, which unfairly restricts access for low-income women to insurance coverage for abortions, was more than mere advocacy.

They seemed to dictate the finer points of the amendment, and managed to bully members of Congress to vote for added restrictions on a perfectly legal surgical procedure.

And this effort was subsidized by taxpayers, since the Council enjoys tax-exempt status.

Though a strong argument can be made that the USCCB should have its tax-exempt status revoked, that is unlikely to happen. Like the defense industry and Wall Street, the Catholic Church flexes formidable political muscle. To paraphrase the late Lenny Bruce, who was by equal measures appalled and impressed by the reach of the Vatican: they don't call it the Church for nothing.

The most effective way to negate the militantly conservative influence of the institutional Catholic Church and its newfound conservative evangelical allies is to target the laws regulating lobbying.

Religious organizations get automatic 501(c)(3) status, which essentially exempts them from most lobbying restrictions and reporting requirements that other nonprofits face. That status should not be automatic.

Like other nonprofits, religious groups should have to petition for 501(c)(3) status. If a religious group has a history of political action, that status should be denied. And if a religious group qualifies for such status but then violates the guidelines, that status should be revoked.

In this age of increasing political transparency, reporting requirements — especially as they relate to lobbying — have become more stringent. Within this context, it is outrageous that the USCCB can spend unknown amounts of money and countless hours in face-to-face lobbying time without having to disclose any of the details.

It is clearly in the national interest to know how religious groups conduct tax-exempt public activities. In a narrower sense, it is also in the interests of all religious denominations to know how the groups that work in their name operate — on the federal level, and on the state and local level, as well.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Sin tax, Father Feeney, Harvard ‘ACT UP’ show gets rise from right-wingers, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Culture and Lifestyle, Religion, Christianity,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 07/24 ]   Lar Lubovitch Dance Company  @ Jacob's Pillow, Ted Shawn Theatre
[ 07/24 ]   Lucinda Williams + Amos Lee + Qwill  @ Meadowbrook U.S. Cellular Pavilion
Share this entry with Delicious
    Understanding the debate about raising the debt ceiling, and imagining the economic crisis that will follow if Congress fails to do so, is really very simple.
  •   RUPERT MURDOCH'S WATERGATE  |  July 13, 2011
    Murdoch is a tycoon of darkness. Aside from his handful of quality publications — the Wall Street Journal, the Times of London, the Times Literary Supplement, and the Australian — his News Corporation specializes in smears, sensationalism, and mendacity.
    In the coming weeks, initial plans by the Christian Science Church to develop the plaza will be reviewed by a citizens advisory committee of the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA). This is the next step in an intricate process intended to balance the project's commercial viability with the public interest.  
  •   FREEDOM TO MARRY  |  June 30, 2011
    At last, good news. After demoralizing reversals in California, Oregon, Maine, and Rhode Island, New York's stunning decision to legalize same-sex marriage rekindles hope in the hearts of decent folk across the nation who are working and waiting for the day when gender becomes irrelevant for all who wish to celebrate their mutual love and commitment by enrolling in the ranks of the legally married.
  •   TOO BIG TO SUE: WAL-MART VERSUS WOMEN  |  June 27, 2011
    Getting screwed just isn't enough. Stripped of all the legal mumbo-jumbo, that's what the five Republican-appointed justices on the Supreme Court decided when they threw out claims that Wal-Mart's 1.5 million female workers were systematically discriminated against, denied an equal shot at promotion, and awarded lower raises than their male coworkers.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2011 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group