The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Books  |  Comedy  |  Dance  |  Museum And Gallery  |  Theater
Best of Boston 2009

Promise deferred

The new ICA’s visual arts at one year
By GREG COOK  |  December 9, 2007
INSIDEICA_Muller_ICA_030
AS BELOW, SO ABOVE: Muller doesn’t get very far beyond the fun premise of a music geek’s High
Fidelity list game.

Last December 10, the Institute of Contemporary Art moved from a cramped former police station in the Back Bay to brand new digs on the South Boston waterfront, tripling its exhibition space in the process. For many, the glass-and-steel building — designed by the buzzed-about New York firm of Diller Scofidio + Renfro, with its dramatic harbor views and cantilevered top floor reaching 80 feet out toward the water’s edge — lived up to the museum’s advertising slogans: “Breathtaking, sublime, fearless, audacious.” It was a big, bold, $51 million move that dared the museum and the entire Boston art scene to live up to it.

Two new exhibitions — “Momentum 9: Kader Attia” on the fourth floor and “Dave Muller: As Below, So Above” on the lobby art wall — mark the end of the new ICA’s first year and the first full cycle of all the building’s galleries. And they don’t live up to this challenge.

For Kader Attia’s first US solo show, which was organized by ICA chief curator Nicholas Baume, the French-Algerian artist turns a gallery into a dreary spartan dormitory crammed with 24 plywood beds topped by foam mattresses. Bare lightbulbs hang from the ceiling, dimly lighting the room. The scene reflects his childhood in an émigré family in suburban Paris, where five kids would sleep in a room, apparently on makeshift beds similar to these. The untitled installation resembles an orphanage, a prison, or a concentration camp. The imprints of absent bodies are gouged out of the mattresses, recalling the excavated remains of volcano victims, or outlines drawn at crime scenes. These analogies sound rich, but in person the show feels like bad poetry: heavy-handed, forced, simplistic.

Assistant curator Jen Mergel organized the Muller exhibition. The Los Angeles artist and DJ has painted a time line of rock stars across the middle of the big wall and then added trees, rocks, hills, leaves, and snowmen sprouting above and below it. The effect is that of an archæological cross-section. Atop the wall painting, he’s hung framed realist paintings, arranged like pinwheels or stars, of faux aged newspaper-arts-section headings. A DIY radio station broadcasts tunes from Muller’s collection of 20,000 albums (catalogued in a 1418-page book visitors can flip through) to three radios in the lobby.

The music chart is appropriated from the book Rock ’n’ Roll Is Here To Pay: The History and Politics of the Music Industry, a ’70s social history of rock by Steve Chapple and Reebee Garofalo that critiqued its commercialism and noted the buried African-American roots of many white hits. Muller adds music since the ’70s, written backward and in a declining slope to suggest, it would seem, the decline and backward-looking slant of music since. It can be fun to play these music-geek High Fidelity list games, but he adds little besides moving them into the hoity-toity confines of the museum. Unlabeled arrows running below the time line appear to indicate unacknowledged black sources for rock. This is important but old news. And Muller’s visual metaphor of plants sprouting from this “soil” is obvious, literal, and dull.

After the wow of the new building, most of the year’s 12 exhibitions of visual art (there have also been theater, music, and dance programs) have felt professional but bland. The best show was the Philip-Lorca diCorcia retrospective this summer, organized by associate curator Bennett Simpson, who left for Los Angeles’s Museum of Contemporary Art in April. It wasn’t groundbreaking, but it was a handsome, smart, thorough mid-career survey of a major American postmodern photographer with ties to Boston (he studied at the Museum School) and the ICA.

Curator Carole Anne Meehan organized the Foster Prize exhibit, a biennial showcase of the work of four up-and-coming Boston-area artists, and “Art on the Harbor Islands,” both of which were promising but flawed. Assistant curator Emily Moore Brouillet put together “Momentum 7: Misaki Kawai,” which featured a crafty cute-brut artist whose poppy shine seemed dulled in a dark ICA installation, and “Bourgeois in Boston,” an okay mini survey of an artist who has been making great work in recent years. The museum opened a year ago with Baume’s “Super Vision,” a backward-looking parade of too many of the usual Artforum suspects and too few surprises. Let’s hope the offerings will get sharper as everyone settles into the new building.

ICA director Jill Medvedow, of course, has a different view. “I think we’ve had a triumphant first year,” she tells me. “I’m not looking right now to change a lot. I’m looking to sustain.”

Certainly a major success is the ICA’s attraction of a broader audience. The museum reports that attendance has topped 280,000 (11 times more than annual visits in the past) and that membership includes more than 10,000 households. Some observers charge that this has come at the cost of less edgy, more “family friendly” exhibitions. Medvedow doesn’t see these as exclusive aims. “If you go through the list of artists in the new ICA since we opened, you’re going to see as many edgy artists as artists who are more familiar. The notion of pandering is absolutely wrongheaded and wrong-minded. But the idea of approachable is a very positive statement about the ICA’s programming.”

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Game show, Smoke and mirrors (and elephants) at the ICA, Beyond dollars and square feet, More more >
  Topics: Museum And Gallery , Barbara Lee, Brandeis University, Cultural Institutions and Parks,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Promise deferred
Interesting article, although you must remember how conservative the boston audience is and their expectations. The type of visitor isn't always the art history student, or artist, but completely the opposite. In comparison to the old location, I agree that the exhibitions have been made somewhat "family friendly." The Supervision exhibit may have had the usual suspects, but really got a lot of people who haven't experienced contemporary art in boston before excited. The James Turrell piece was stunning and smart. People would wait outside just to view it. This was a perfect show to introduce contemporary art to Boston for the many people uneducated in it. I think that you need to spend some more time with the pieces. And, because we have more exhibition space, there are shows that the ica would've never been able to exhibit in the previous location. The programs offered at the ica have also been a major success, with maybe two or three performances bust. The mediateque room offers to view films and interviews. One could spend an hour alone in there. There are free i-pod tours in which you can even download from your own computer from the website. The teen program is a major hit and discussions with the artists on target free nights is such a great opportunity for the common visitor to speak with the artist directly about his/her work. You also forgot to mention the many number of tour groups that come in for guided and self-guided tours. There are a lot of things you left out in this article. And, its almost as if you hadn't read any articles that has come out about the ica in the first year. Word of advice: Spend more time with the art because you clearly didn't, and get to know the many programs and benefits that the ica has given.....of which they didn't before. skyela
By skyelaheitz on 11/30/2007 at 3:15:49
Promise deferred
Greg Cook - I think it's important to know all the facts about the ICA before you critize it in your article. It is a shame that you haven't had the time to do your research.
By kim Chi on 12/02/2007 at 11:45:47
Promise deferred
Greg Cook - As a large supporter of the arts, I feel it is unfair for you to make statements comparing the exhibition space of the ICA's to other institutions: "The Museum of Fine Arts’ expansion and renovation, which is scheduled to be completed in 2010, promises to offer more exhibition space for contemporary and late-20th-century art than does the new ICA. The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, the Harvard Art Museums, Lincoln’s DeCordova Museum, and Brandeis’s Rose Art Museum are all planning renovations and/or expansions. Modern and contemporary art are soon going to have a much bigger profile here. One early result was this summer’s ravishing Joseph Cornell retrospective, perhaps the most significant survey of his work in a quarter-century, at Salem’s Peabody Essex Museum, which completed a renovation and expansion in 2004. These are very different institutions in that they are older, and bigger benefactors. MFA Boston: established 1870 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum: established 1903 Peabody Essex Museum: Founded 1799,in 1992, the Peabody Museum of Salem merged with the Essex Institute to form the Peabody Essex Museum. ICA Boston - Founded 1936
By muimui on 12/02/2007 at 12:56:54

ARTICLES BY GREG COOK
Share this entry with Delicious

 See all articles by: GREG COOK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group