The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Ring of fire

The deadbeat FBI fails to pay its phone bills and jeopardizes its wiretapping program
By HARVEY SILVERGLATE  |  January 23, 2008


An ugly squabble between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the nation’s biggest phone companies has, in one nasty blow, recast the image of all the entities involved. It will now be difficult not to think of the FBI as a deadbeat and hypocritical agency, nor of the phone giants as disloyal and hypocritical dollar chasers, thanks to a problem concerning payment for the FBI’s wiretap program.

The reason that the nation’s top phone companies stopped spying on their customers, it turns out, was not due to a sudden fit of conscience, ethics, or loyalty. Rather, when the FBI stopped paying its phone bill for wiretapping services, the phone companies stopped performing their patriotic duty, ceased serving their government masters, and focused instead (dare we say predictably?) on their corporate pocketbooks.

(Recall that the companies had relied on a claim of patriotism when seeking to defend themselves against criticism and lawsuits for unlawful invasion of customers’ privacy. This was the telecommunications industry’s mantra when it lobbied Congress for immunity from such lawsuits.)

And so we are wronged once again, this time by the knowledge that our telecommunications providers betrayed us not out of idealism nor duty, but for money.

The FBI, by not paying its bills for wiretapping services, likewise put the lie to the notion that our national security depends upon warrantless snooping. Yeah, it’s a great weapon for detecting terrorists in our midst, say the Feds, but not worth paying for. And then, when the FBI found it necessary to defend its disastrous bookkeeping — something the Department of Justice (DOJ) has indicted many an individual or corporation for — it sought cover from a supposedly “independent” outside auditor that turned out not to be quite so independent.

But we’re getting ahead of our story.

Patriots for hire
After years of vocal protest, privacy advocates at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) finally got their wish: part of the federal government’s warrantless surveillance program has begun to unravel. The major telephone companies announced on January 10 that they would no longer cooperate with the FBI’s wiretapping program. One would think that civil libertarians are rejoicing over the news. But the more one learns about the true reasons behind the wiretapping program’s partial demise, the more disillusioned one becomes.

First, let’s consider the craven and profit-driven actions of executives at AT&T Corp., BellSouth Corp., and Verizon Telecommunications. All three companies complied with the hyper-secret National Security Agency’s unprecedented order to build a vast database of customer calling records sometime after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, even though the agency had not obtained a wiretap warrant in accordance with the rather clear procedures set out in federal-communications privacy statutes. A fourth telecom giant, Qwest Communications, refused because of “a disinclination on the part of the authorities to use any legal process,” according to a statement released in May 2006 by an attorney for the company’s former chief executive, Joseph Nacchio. In 2005, in what many legal pundits have called a retaliatory prosecution, Nacchio was charged with insider trading. A jury convicted him on 19 of 42 counts and he faces six years in prison, pending appeal.

1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: A spate of phony ‘terror’ plots, William Lemmer: Coming home, Pressing the case, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Politics, U.S. Politics, Information Privacy,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 08/12 ]   "Eric Larivee's Summer Cocktail"  @ Ryles
[ 08/12 ]   Guster + Jack's Mannequin + Ra Ra Riot  @ Bank of America Pavilion
[ 08/12 ]   Waiting For Godot  @ Fenix Theatre Company
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   2011 MUZZLE AWARDS: CAMPUS EDITION  |  June 29, 2011
    Law school is not known for being fun, so some professors spice instruction with far-fetched hypotheticals. To some students at Widener University School of Law in Wilmington, Delaware, one longtime criminal-law prof's hypos went too far.  
    Sal DiMasi is no saint, but that doesn't mean he's a criminal. His behavior makes us grimace, but it simply doesn't amount to a state or federal felony.
  •   DOJ TURNS ON TURNER, FIRST AMENDMENT  |  January 26, 2011
    The sentencing memorandum filed by Boston federal prosecutors last week, seeking between 33 and 41 months of incarceration for convicted former Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner, is no ordinary document.
  •   TERROR AND THE MBTA: YOU DON’T LOOK HARMLESS  |  December 29, 2010
    Racial profiling meets war on terror: The highest federal court in New England has said it’s okay for government officials single out dark-skinned people for searches,  as long as they can concoct some cover rationale, ginned up with vague allusions to terrorism.
    The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts made a pronouncement last week that, to rational citizens, should be obvious: it's a bad idea for the state to be complicit in a scheme to pay criminal trial witnesses for their testimony — and for those witnesses to receive a bonus if the defendant is convicted.

 See all articles by: HARVEY SILVERGLATE

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed