The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics
bmp_2009

The blessing of abortion

By ADAM REILLY  |  June 3, 2009

Wreaking havoc
Episcopal Divinity School — which sits on Brattle Street, a stone's throw from both Cambridge Common and Harvard Square — is the product of the 1974 merger of two venerable Episcopal bulwarks: Cambridge's Episcopal Theological School (ETS) and the Philadelphia Divinity School (PDS). As an institution, EDS's DNA is decidedly liberal: the hundred or so students (both laity and clergy) who currently study there count among their predecessors John Burgess, the Episcopal Church's first African-American bishop, and Paul van Buren, a controversial theologian linked with the "Death of God" movement in the 1960s.

I recently visited Ragsdale in her spacious, largely empty office on EDS's neo-medieval campus. She'll officially start on July 1, after leaving her post as president and executive director of Political Research Associates, the Somerville-based think tank that tracks right-wing extremism. (She'll also step down as vicar of St. David's Church in Pepperell.)

For an alleged satanic surrogate, Ragsdale is rather disarming in the flesh. Her manner is simultaneously affable and matter-of-fact, with none of the extreme unctuousness that often afflicts men and women of the cloth. Her most idiosyncratic physical trait, meanwhile, is a somewhat sleepy-looking face that, oddly, evokes the young Bill Buckley.

In Ragsdale's telling, she was entirely unsurprised by the furor that followed her appointment as EDS dean. "I've been one of the leaders in the Episcopal Church, and in the ecumenical interfaith community, on the theological underpinnings of abortion rights," she explains, "so I've been doing this stuff forever." (Among other things, she chaired the board of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice for eight years, and currently sits on the board of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, a/k/a NARAL Pro-Choice America.)

Her EDS colleagues, however, may have found the hubbub a bit more jarring. "The church has been so focused on gay and lesbian issues that they were sort of prepared for that," says Ragsdale. "What they didn't realize, I think, is that the anti–women's rights people are much more ferocious than the anti-gay people."

While Ragsdale's relatively low-key response may stem, in part, from her years in the pro-choice trenches, there are some additional factors worth noting. One is her understanding of what motivates her detractors. As Ragsdale sees it, her critics aren't giving voice to spontaneous, genuine moral outrage. Instead, they're being manipulated by shadowy outsiders eager to wreak havoc in the Episcopal Church.

Now for some quick background. In 2003, Gene Robinson, who is openly gay, was elected Episcopal bishop of New Hampshire. His election inflamed already-simmering tensions between the increasingly liberal Episcopal Church — the US arm of the worldwide Anglican Communion — and conservative Anglicans around the globe. It also led some conservative Episcopalian communities in the US to secede from the church, often by affiliating themselves with theologically conservative Anglican bishops from Africa. Rowan Williams — the Englishman who leads the Anglican Communion as Archbishop of Canterbury (but lacks the authority the pope enjoys in the Roman Catholic Church) — currently has the unenviable task of preventing a full-blown Anglican schism; whether he'll succeed remains to be seen.

In the press, discord between Episcopalian and Anglican liberals and their conservative brethren is usually treated as the product of sincere theological disagreement. (See, for example, New Yorker writer Peter Boyer's April 2006 profile of Robinson.) But Ragsdale takes a different view. According to her, the current dissatisfaction of conservative Episcopalians and Anglicans stems less from widespread resistance to the church's stance on social issues (homosexuality, abortion, the ordination of women, the reliability or fallibility of Scripture) than from outside groups eager to keep the Episcopal Church — and other mainline Protestant denominations — from successfully pushing their progressive agenda.

"The churches were real leaders of the civil-rights movement and the anti-war movement," notes Ragsdale, "and after we got out of Vietnam, they turned their attention to the problems of capitalism, causing a panic among wealthy business folks who'd just seen the churches be successful [on those issues]. So you had these organizations that really weren't connected with the churches at all forming to foment discord in the churches, to keep them so busy fighting among themselves or within themselves that they couldn't continue to do their progressive social-action work."

Exhibit A, she claims, is the Washington, DC–based Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD) — whose president, Mark Tooley, dubbed Ragsdale the "High Priestess of Abortion" in a May 8 American Spectator piece. (To support this claim, Ragsdale cites a grant proposal in which the IRD speaks of "redirecting [Protestant] churches away from their reflexive alliance with the political left.") "They want to undercut mainstream Episcopalianism, and they want to undercut this seminary as one of the [places] that supports the instincts of mainstream Episcopalianism," she says. "So I become another opportunity for them to create trouble."

In addition to arguing that her critics' rage is inorganic — that it's the product, essentially, of right-wing ideological carpetbaggers — Ragsdale also dismisses their arguments as illogical. The idea that abortion kills a child, she contends, reflects parental hopes and dreams for the child-to-be, not the reality of what the zygote or fetus actually is. (It is, in her words, "proleptic," a theological term for anticipated realities that come to be treated as extant in the here and now.)

< prev  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |   next >
Related: Personally speaking, Hard sell, The problem with the Church's selective embrace, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Abortion, Abortion Policy, Barack Obama,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Re: The blessing of abortion
Sorry...this lady's a joke. www.horriblesanity.com
By Horrible Sanity on 06/04/2009 at 6:54:48
Re: The blessing of abortion
I want to thank the editors for publishing this article. It is very representative of the depths to which this country has fallen. In Nazi Germany when Jews, gypsys, and others were labled less than human, the world grew outraged and condemed the immorality. Now the church is saying that a human being can have it's head punctured, brain sucked out, or limbs torn from a body and it's a blessing? If this is the view of the Episcopal Church, then Josef Mengele must be their patron saint. I grive the theology this woman must be endorsing  and ask how can anyone with such vileness and disregard for children be a priest or the head of a seminary? But I know the answer; somewhere along the way, her theology and personal views have been validated. When will the world stand up to her? Or will be simply go our own ways, nodding in affirmation to the values Hitler offered?
By RevJLS on 06/04/2009 at 1:20:20
Re: The blessing of abortion
I want to thank the editors for publishing this article. It is very representative of the depths to which this country has fallen. In Nazi Germany when Jews, gypsys, and others were labled less than human, the world grew outraged and condemed the immorality. Now the church is saying that a human being can have it's head punctured, brain sucked out, or limbs torn from a body and it's a blessing? If this is the view of the Episcopal Church, then Josef Mengele must be their patron saint. I grive the theology this woman must be endorsing  and ask how can anyone with such vileness and disregard for children be a priest or the head of a seminary? But I know the answer; somewhere along the way, her theology and personal views have been validated. When will the world stand up to her? Or will we simply go our own ways, nodding in affirmation to the values Hitler offered?
By RevJLS on 06/04/2009 at 1:20:38
Re: The blessing of abortion
I want to thank the editors for publishing this article. It is very representative of the depths to which this country has fallen. In Nazi Germany when Jews, gypsys, and others were labled less than human, the world grew outraged and condemed the immorality. Now the church is saying that a human being can have it's head punctured, brain sucked out, or limbs torn from a body and it's a blessing? If this is the view of the Episcopal Church, then Josef Mengele must be their patron saint. I grive the theology this woman must be endorsing  and ask how can anyone with such vileness and disregard for children be a priest or the head of a seminary? But I know the answer; somewhere along the way, her theology and personal views have been validated. When will the world stand up to her? Or will we simply go our own ways, nodding in affirmation to the values Hitler offered?
By RevJLS on 06/04/2009 at 1:21:16
Re: The blessing of abortion
It CONFOUNDS me - how the ANTI-CHOICE peoples cannot see the BLATANT hypocrisy of  actions & words….to all you christians out there....
isnt it true that the bible more or less says..
“ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE”
soooo...What someone else does with thier body - really isnt any of your business If god thinks its wrong - he'll sort it out with that person on "judgement day"...till then - Mind your own BIZ  - you'll probably find yourself alot happier!  :)
Also what about the bible passage - and i’m paraphrasing here - …
don’t point out the tiny splinter in your neighbors eye - when there is a full 4×4 plank in your own eye !” so what if you think these people are “sinning” - let god sort em out…
mind your own soul. *God must REEEALY like DUMB PEOPLE - Cause he made SO MANY of them!!!*
By hilary clare on 06/04/2009 at 1:38:18
Re: The blessing of abortion
 hey hilary, what if you witnessed someone mugging an 80 year old lady with a walker, and when you confronted him, he replied, "Mind your own BIZ. ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE.mind your own soul", I suppose you'd reply "Gee, you're right. I never thought of that.", and then you'd just walk away and not do anything.Please ponder the following: Do you think there's a difference between 'judging' and 'observation'?"God must REEEALY like DUMB PEOPLE - Cause he made SO MANY of them!!!" Stoopid iz as stoopid sez. I tend to think that people make themselves stupid by unreflectively buying into cultural propaganda.You know the type.Or maybe I'm the dumb one and your post is a subtle parody?
By Robert Fisher on 06/04/2009 at 1:52:41
Re: The blessing of abortion
Hilary -- we believe that God will judge our souls, but that doesn't preclude our judging one's actions in this life. What do you think laws are for?
By LaBoulangere on 06/04/2009 at 7:24:47
Re: The blessing of abortion
Somewhere between conception and birth the zygote becomes a human being capable of thinking and feeling. The right of human beings not to be destroyed trumps the rights of others to greater personal convenience- especially given the adoption option.
By Farnkoff on 06/04/2009 at 7:51:04
Re: The blessing of abortion
If the fetus cannot live w/o the mother - ITS NOT ALIVE!!!it is ONLY alive due to its dependance on the  mother.. UNTIL it is able to live on its own (5 months or so if prematurely born)... it is like a part of your body...
its akin to clipping one's fingernails - or cutting ones hair - or removing a wart...
 Its like they always say.... "if you dont like Abortions... DONT HAVE ONE" Other peoples Uterus's are NONE of YOUR business!!!What would happen if you got impregnated against your will by RAPE?  would you like the option to have control of your  body?    It seems as if people care MORE about an unborn cluster of cells - than people who are actually alive...  pro-life / anti-choice people supporting the death penalty & supporting the WAR in IRAQ...a little hypocritical don't ya think? People who DO NOT support Abortions are NOT thinking with science - they are thinking with religious ideals & fables - which as we all know are NOT VERY SCIENTIFIC (flat earth anyone?)   Religion has disempowered women to have contol over their bodies & lives.  I donno about you, but I'm GLAD I dont live in the DARK AGES!!!  

 
By hilary clare on 06/05/2009 at 12:13:11
Re: The blessing of abortion
I tend to think that people make themselves stupid by unreflectively buying into religous propaganda...
By hilary clare on 06/05/2009 at 12:16:49
Re: The blessing of abortion
I tend to think that people make themselves stupid by unreflectively buying into religious propaganda...
By hilary clare on 06/05/2009 at 12:17:13
Re: The blessing of abortion
@ Robert Fisher - - - I tend to think that people make themselves stupid by not using fact based & critical thinking skills and blindly buying into religious propaganda. also if you do not have a uterus - your opinion of this matter is completely irrelevant.
By hilary clare on 06/05/2009 at 12:22:05
Re: The blessing of abortion
Let’s see . . . In her first post, Hilary Clare takes off on "dumb people," but in that 139-word screed, she manages 16 mistakes in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, word choice, and/or pronoun usage [see below]. Sorta makes you wonder, don’t it? (Later posts also go after "stupid" people. Good job, there, Hilary.) It CONFOUNDS me - how the ANTI-CHOICE peoples [(1) Nope: It’s "people."] cannot see the BLATANT hypocrisy of actions & words….to all you christians [(2) Nope: It’s "Christians."] out there.... isnt [(3) Nope: It’s "Isn’t."] it true that the bible more or less says.. "ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE" soooo...What someone else does with thier [(4 & 5) Nope: It’s "their." But even it you spell that pronoun correctly, it needs to be singular to agree with its antecedent – "her."] body - really isnt [(6) See #3.] any of your business - If god [(7) Nope: It’s "God."] thinks its [(8) Nope: It’s "it’s."] wrong - he'll [(9) Nope: It’s "He."] sort it out with that person on "judgement [(10) Nope: It’s "judgment."] day"...till then - Mind your own BIZ - you'll probably find yourself alot [(11) Nope: It’s "a lot" (two words).] happier! :) Also what about the bible passage - and i’m [(12) Nope: It’s "I’m."] paraphrasing here - … "don’t point out the tiny splinter in your neighbors [(13) Nope: It’s "neighbor’s."] eye - when there is a full 4×4 plank in your own eye !" so [(14) Nope: It’s "So."] what if you think these people are "sinning" - let god [(15) See # 6.] sort em [(16) Nope: It needs an apostrophe – "’em."] out… mind your own soul. *God must REEEALY like DUMB PEOPLE - Cause he made SO MANY of them!!!* But apart from these solecisms, the real problem with Hilary is her error in fact: She speaks of "[w]hat someone does with thier [sic] body." The body of the human being inside a woman’s uterus is not the body of the woman. That tiny human being has completely different DNA; more likely than not, it has a different blood type; it has about a 50-50 chance of being a boy; it can have different color eyes, hair, skin, etc. Even a "stupid" person knows that the child’s body is not the mother’s body.  The issue is not about what a woman does to HER OWN body. Very simply -- as Planned Parenthood wrote in a pamphlet ("Plan Your Children for Health and Happiness") in 1963:  "An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun." 
By Tom Long on 06/05/2009 at 1:19:30
Re: The blessing of abortion
Let’s see . . . In her first post, Hilary Clare takes off on "dumb people," but in that 139-word screed, she manages 16 mistakes in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, word choice, and/or pronoun usage [see below]. Sorta makes you wonder, don’t it? (Later posts also go after "stupid" people. Good job, there, Hilary.) It CONFOUNDS me - how the ANTI-CHOICE peoples [(1) Nope: It’s "people."] cannot see the BLATANT hypocrisy of actions & words….to all you christians [(2) Nope: It’s "Christians."] out there.... isnt [(3) Nope: It’s "Isn’t."] it true that the bible more or less says.. "ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE" soooo...What someone else does with thier [(4 & 5) Nope: It’s "their." But even it you spell that pronoun correctly, it needs to be singular to agree with its antecedent – "her."] body - really isnt [(6) See #3.] any of your business - If god [(7) Nope: It’s "God."] thinks its [(8) Nope: It’s "it’s."] wrong - he'll [(9) Nope: It’s "He."] sort it out with that person on "judgement [(10) Nope: It’s "judgment."] day"...till then - Mind your own BIZ - you'll probably find yourself alot [(11) Nope: It’s "a lot" (two words).] happier! :) Also what about the bible passage - and i’m [(12) Nope: It’s "I’m."] paraphrasing here - … "don’t point out the tiny splinter in your neighbors [(13) Nope: It’s "neighbor’s."] eye - when there is a full 4×4 plank in your own eye !" so [(14) Nope: It’s "So."] what if you think these people are "sinning" - let god [(15) See # 6.] sort em [(16) Nope: It needs an apostrophe – "’em."] out… mind your own soul. *God must REEEALY like DUMB PEOPLE - Cause he made SO MANY of them!!!* But apart from these solecisms, the real problem with Hilary is her error in fact: She speaks of "[w]hat someone does with thier [sic] body." The body of the human being inside a woman’s uterus is not the body of the woman. That tiny human being has completely different DNA; more likely than not, it has a different blood type; it has about a 50-50 chance of being a boy; it can have different color eyes, hair, skin, etc. Even a "stupid" person knows that the child’s body is not the mother’s body.  The issue is not about what a woman does to HER OWN body. Very simply -- as Planned Parenthood wrote in a pamphlet ("Plan Your Children for Health and Happiness") in 1963:  "An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun." 
By Tom Long on 06/05/2009 at 1:19:52
Re: The blessing of abortion
Yes, Ragsdale's "abortion is a blessing" remarks sound provocative.  That's why I searched the web to find the full text of her sermon/speech in Birmingham, and read it in its full context.  Reverend Ragsdale makes it clear that it is women's moral agency which is at stake, and that if those who oppose abortion truly want to reduce its frequency, then they need to address the various problems which make it a necessity. And the parallel she makes with her brother's heart surgery is very apropros.  Imagine a segment of society arguing that we should not do heart surgeries at all, citing some moralistic absolute, while at the same time opposing changes in diet and lifestyle which could substantially reduce the frequency of the very thing they claim to hate. So for all of you commenting here on how much you hate abortion ... Will you stand up for widespread availability of contraception and meaningful sex education, thus preventing unintented pregnancies?  Will you stand up for economic changes to lift women out of poverty, including affordable childcare?  Will you stand up to confront violence against women, whether it be rape by a stranger or abuse by someone who claims to love them? You can't have it both ways.  You can't condemn abortion while turning a blind eye to the tragedies which bring it about.  You can't call for reducing or eliminating abortion while opposing the most effective means of doing so.  You can't go on claiming the moral high ground by denying women any moral agency to choose whether and when to bear and beget a child.
By Desmond Ravenstone on 06/05/2009 at 7:38:07
Re: The blessing of abortion
 Thanks Desmond: very well put. I find it intersting that no-one has taken you up on your challenge. I suppose it is easier to point fingers, prosthelytize, cut and paste quotes from the 60's, utilize the same old tired Nazi-non sequiteur-ad hominem attacks and call someone out on their poor grammar skills than address the real issues that surround abortion.
By mezzobuff on 06/06/2009 at 11:29:43
Re: The blessing of abortion
I'll take it one step further than Desmond. Are anti-abortionists willing to support research into reproductive technologies so that removing an embryo/zygote from a pregnant woman does not result in its non-viability? Think of what a boon that would be; most adoptive mothers could experience pregancy and be better prepared to the addition to their family; the IVF success rate would vastly improve and the need for surrogate mothers would be greatly reduced.
By cass_m on 06/06/2009 at 2:04:58
Re: The blessing of abortion
It is incredibly sad that the Episcopal Church, once a force in American life, has dwindled to so few members that the only ones remaining condone a leader who considers abortion "a blessing." Life is precious from conception to natural death, and no dean of a dying seminary can change that fact. I hope someday the Episcopal Church will remember the ideals it was actually founded upon.
By Timothy on 06/06/2009 at 3:30:19
Re: The blessing of abortion
Desmond- Certainly I support sex education, availability of contraception to minors, and anti-poverty measures as well as health care reform. In most respects I am a liberal- but I feel that abortion is, in most cases, an inhumane option.
By Farnkoff on 06/06/2009 at 8:10:13
Re: The blessing of abortion
Farnkoff wrote: "Desmond- Certainly I support sex education, availability of contraception to minors, and anti-poverty measures as well as health care reform. In most respects I am a liberal- but I feel that abortion is, in most cases, an inhumane option."   I can certainly respect that overall viewpoint, which is in line with what some call a "consistent pro-life" position.  Where we disagree the most is your dismissive stereotype that women who choose abortion do so out of "personal convenience."  Can you even point to a reliable survey of women who have had abortions, and their reasons why?  I would hope that more of us could work together towards reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies to begin with, rather than making such negative blanket judgements about women's motivations behind their choices.
By Desmond Ravenstone on 06/06/2009 at 9:13:42
Re: The blessing of abortion
Thank you, Katherine, from the very bottom of my heart. That is all I will say.
By wrenbaby on 06/08/2009 at 9:47:12

ARTICLES BY ADAM REILLY
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   THE BLESSING OF ABORTION  |  June 03, 2009
    Pro-choice provocateur: Meet Cambridge divinity dean Katherine Ragsdale
  •   TRANS FACT  |  May 20, 2009
    When a person in the center of a media maelstrom has had a sex change, is it fair game for the press?
  •   DEAL OR NO DEAL?  |  May 15, 2009
    Will the Globe 's biggest union balk at the Times Co.'s offer? Plus, the Christian Science Monitor 's quietly successful re-launch, and sportswriter Bill Simmons's GM jones
  •   DIE ANOTHER DAY  |  May 07, 2009
    The clock starts now on a potential Globe sale
  •   WILL THE GLOBE SURVIVE?  |  April 30, 2009
    Sizing up the paper's future as it approaches the deadline from hell

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group