The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics
Best of Boston 2009

The problem with heroes

Lessons from the build-them-up, tear-them-down Boston firefighter backlash
By ADAM REILLY  |  October 10, 2007


Small Scoop
The Boston Globe was the first to report the leaked autopsy results for Boston firefighters Paul Cahill and Warren Payne, posting an item on’s Local News Updates blog on the evening of October 3. But the Globe’s achievement comes with an asterisk, since it took a questionable injunction — now overturned — from Suffolk Superior Court Judge Merita Hopkins to keep WHDH-TV from getting there first.

Even the hardest-hearted news consumer had to wince this past week when the private autopsy results of Paul Cahill and Warren Payne were leaked to some of the press. Cahill and Payne were, of course, the Boston firefighters who died in a restaurant blaze in August and were promptly lionized by the public and the press. While the Phoenix has not seen the autopsy data, Cahill, according to multiple news reports, had a blood-alcohol level of .27 at the time of his death, more than three times the legal limit for drivers. Payne, meanwhile, had traces of cocaine in his system (and marijuana, according to the Boston Herald), though it’s not clear whether or how much he was impaired when he was killed fighting the fire.

This was — and remains — a multifaceted story. There are the painful issues of whether Cahill and Payne’s alleged substance use contributed to their deaths and endangered their fellow firefighters. There are lingering questions about the scope of substance abuse in the Boston Fire Department (BFD), and why Boston does less to screen for substance abuse than many other cities. (The Globe reported that, despite a lax testing protocol, 10 percent of the department has been ordered into treatment in the past three years; according to a recent medical study, 10 percent of all US adults have problems with substance abuse at some point.) There’s even a freedom-of-the-press element: a judge’s ruling (dubious and quickly overturned, but all too characteristic of government opacity in Boston and Massachusetts) kept WHDH-TV from breaking news of the autopsy results on October 3.

But ultimately — at its core — this story is about our collective need for heroes, the press’s collusion in that quest, and the way we respond when those heroes fall from grace.

Consider the way response to Cahill and Payne’s autopsies played out in the Herald, which diligently positions itself as the paper of blue-collar Boston in general and of Boston cops and firefighters in particular. A story on the results — titled FIREHOUSE SHOCK — led the paper’s front page on October 4. By midmorning, the story had attracted more than 100 comments on the Herald’s Web site, the vast majority of them negative. “These men are heroes,” complained one reader. “To make this news is a disgrace. . . . Leave these men and their poor, suffering families alone. Unless you are willing to charge into an inferno, you are not one to judge.” Another summarily consigned the three Herald reporters who wrote the story to hell. “To O’Ryan Johnson, Laurel J. Sweet and Michele McPhee: Don’t forgot [sic] the sunscreen, you’ll need it where you’re going.”

But public wrath wasn’t limited to the Herald. On October 5, the Boston Globe ran a package of stories hooked to the autopsies. One, on reaction inside the BFD, juxtaposed anonymous acknowledgment of substance abuse inside the department with this irate, on-the-record quote from Captain Patrick Nichols, Payne and Cahill’s former supervisor: “It’s not about me; it’s about the family you shot in the foot,” Nichols said of the press. “All the media is now all over this. [The families have] already gone through hell. This is a lot of crap.”

Too much, too soon
The consolation, for journalists, is that Nichols and his fellow critics are flat-out wrong. Yes, it’s terrible that Payne and Cahill’s families learned these details through press reports. But if some of the men and women charged with protecting Boston from fires are doing their jobs under the influence of mood-altering chemicals, that’s a grave public-safety problem — which makes it a story, for God’s sake. As Globe columnist Joan Vennochi put it on October 7: “Get mad, Boston. Not about the invasion of privacy suffered by the families of two Boston firefighters who died in the line of duty. Get mad about the shocking disregard for every citizen’s life-or-death interest in a drug-and-alcohol-free fire department.”

Good advice, but it lets the press off too easily. After all, the Boston media as a whole set the stage for an anti-media backlash with its initial coverage of Cahill and Payne’s deaths — coverage so laden with feeling and so lacking in detachment that it made the autopsy revelations seem like the journalistic equivalent of a sucker punch.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Media Moses, See no evil, He's number three, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , 9/11, Addiction and Recovery, Boston Fire Department,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
The problem with heroes
This article was written with sensitivity relative to the issues of what the press had to deal with because of the tragedy and subsequent revelations. The concerns of what the loved ones and colleagues left behind must now face must be looked at with compassion There are no easy answers. My concern is the gotcha rivelry that goes on between both Boston dailies. There is a breed of reporters that always asks when you contact a reporter with a proposed story revelation....Have you gone to the Globe?...The other paper's report will ask....Have you gone to the Herald? Hopefully, this was not the path without sensitivity the dailies and TV station involved took for ratings,advertising, or subscriptions. The other issue is that public employment as an honorable profession requires full disclosure at all times. This is the only way to maintain the respect of the citizenry and solve problems that must be corrected. Just this week, we have learned of the possibility maybe ending to get a strong reporter shield law through the legislature to protect journalists and hopefully their sources. Allegations are surfacing of a failing to pass much needed legislation because of this issue and reporting by the media on this tragedy has irked members of the legislature. They see reporters gaining this protection as self serving. Persons of integrity must sort these difficulties. In addition,the time has come for managers of media to adopt a strong code of ethics and reporters a stong code of conduct which is lacking in this era of downsizing and corporate takeovers of the media as we have known in our society.
By john Gatti Jr. on 10/11/2007 at 4:27:59
The problem with heroes
While its tragic these men lost their lives fighting a fire we must remember these are our public safety officials.Would you want some drunk or drug addict responding to your car crash or house fire to render you aid? If the results of the autopsy were not published what do you think would have happened? Nothing,that is the problem. The BFD would have just swept it under the rug, nobody likes to be seen in a negative light. This isn't a 9-11 issue but one of public interest.I know its hard to believe but Fire Fighters are people too. They drive drunk, beat their spouses, drink and do drugs even while on duty. Its a well known dirty secret of the antics of the BFD. One was arrested for driving drunk down the wrong way on I495 crashing into another car this summer, another was killed when he drunkenly fell off a fire pole and broke his neck in the firehouse three years ago. The list goes on and on. I think its high time we held America's Heroes to the same standards we hold everyone else in public safety.Random drug and breathalyzer tests for Police, Fire Fighters, and EMTs would ensure we are all in being served by clean and sober safety professionals. While the media is usually self-serving in their quest for the Pulitzer I think it took courage to expose the condition of these men. It brought a huge safety issue to the citizens of Boston.While I sympathize for the families the greater good can be served by forcing change and accountability on the BFD.
By Scott Knight on 10/11/2007 at 9:36:03

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   TRANS FACT  |  May 20, 2009
    When a person in the center of a media maelstrom has had a sex change, is it fair game for the press?
  •   DEAL OR NO DEAL?  |  May 15, 2009
    Will the Globe 's biggest union balk at the Times Co.'s offer? Plus, the Christian Science Monitor 's quietly successful re-launch, and sportswriter Bill Simmons's GM jones
  •   DIE ANOTHER DAY  |  May 07, 2009
    The clock starts now on a potential Globe sale
  •   WILL THE GLOBE SURVIVE?  |  April 30, 2009
    Sizing up the paper's future as it approaches the deadline from hell
  •   ALL QUIET ON THE TIMES CO. FRONT  |  April 09, 2009
    The Globe crisis leaves New York speechless. Plus, Morrissey Boulevard's problematic political fan club

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

Featured Articles in Books:
  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group