The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

The Pah-ty's ovah

Congressional reps from New England are poised to lead the attack on Republican waste and fraud
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  January 24, 2007


For the past six years, the Republican-run federal government has been free to waste money, reward friends, and act incompetently, knowing that their misdeeds would go unexposed by the legislative branch. By handing Democrats the reins of congressional power, American voters, in effect, sent in a posse to find out what in tarnation’s been going on.

Handling much of the roundup will be Democratic members of the relatively obscure House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. And as it happens, New England is well represented on that committee, occupying five of its 23 Democratic seats. Not with old-timers such as Ed Markey and Jim McGovern, mind you, but with relative newcomers eager to make their marks. Committee returnees John Tierney and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts will be joined by freshmen Paul Hodes of New Hampshire, Christopher Murphy of Connecticut, and Peter Welch of Vermont. And New England’s only House Republican, Christopher Shays of Connecticut, is a minority member.

You name it, the committee can investigate it — and it likely will do so under the leadership of Florida’s Henry Waxman, who promises to be an aggressive chair.

Even as the minority party, Democrats managed to tackle Abu Ghraib, Hurricane Katrina contracts, political interference at the Food and Drug Administration, and much more. But now that they have the power to make serious inquiries, all hell’s about to break loose — and with a New England accent. In switching from minority to majority, Waxman’s supporting staff doubles and his funding soars. The Democrats plan to call hearings and issue official reports to Congress, rather than what, under GOP rule, amounted to lengthy press releases.

Most important, perhaps, the committee will have the power to subpoena witnesses who decline to testify. That’s a “last resort,” says a committee staffer, that Waxman “has said he hopes not to use.” But given the Bush administration’s notorious reluctance to provide information voluntarily, it translates as “ready or not, here they come.”

A surge of attention to Iraq
Most of us are familiar with congressional oversight conducted by high-potency committees in the Senate. That chamber’s Judiciary Committee holds high-profile grillings of nominated judges, for instance; and its Foreign Relations Committee recently berated Condoleezza Rice.

But when it comes to investigating and exposing bad government, House Oversight and Government Reform is where it’s at.

Not that you would know that from recent history. After all, under Republican control, the committee didn’t exactly take a jackhammer to White House stonewalling. In the past two years, it produced just nine official reports (not including a special bipartisan investigation into Hurricane Katrina). Among them were two analyses of drug-control policy; a citizen’s guide to the Freedom of Information Act; a re-examination of baseball slugger Rafael Palmiero’s steroid-use testimony; a discussion of the methamphetamine epidemic; and progress reports on brownfield conversion, nuclear-security standards, and community-development block grants. A typical hearing title: “Gangs, Fraud, and Sexual Predators: Struggling with the Consequences of Illegal Immigration.” Not exactly the sort of stuff that should be preoccupying those charged with holding the world’s mightiest power accountable.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Who’s the real Dem?, Spy vs. Spy, Pardons are forever, More more >
  Topics: Talking Politics , Politics, U.S. Politics, Pregnancy and Childbirth,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
The Pah-ty's ovah
Congressman Waxman is from Los Angeles, not Florida. You are correct, however, that he will be a great chair for the Oversight Committee.
By Takoma on 01/25/2007 at 5:48:46

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   FINAL FOUR?  |  September 30, 2009
    Some of Boston's savviest political insiders were confident of one thing going into last week's preliminary election: the top four finishers in the at-large City Council race would not be the same quartet to actually win those four seats in November.
  •   CAN FLAHERTY WOO YOON?  |  September 28, 2009
    Michael Flaherty, having earned a spot Tuesday on the November ballot, starts his six-week push to the Boston mayoral final with a big problem. He needs Sam Yoon's voters, and to get them he needs Sam Yoon.
  •   SIX FOR THE SEAT  |  September 16, 2009
    Over the next few months, as candidates for the US Senate travel the state, you're likely to hear them say again and again that nobody can ever truly replace Ted Kennedy. That's the truth. But what does the state want next, after such a legendary, larger-than-life figure?
  •   MENINO'S 50-PERCENT SOLUTION  |  September 11, 2009
    For years, many in Boston (including here at the Phoenix ) have lamented the absence of a vigorous campaign that would force the long-time incumbent to defend his record and discuss the issues.
  •   GIANT SHADOW  |  September 02, 2009
    One striking aspect of the Kennedy tributes was the focus on the help he and his office provided for ordinary individuals in Massachusetts — all those things that fall under the category of "constituent services."

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group