The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Flashbacks  |  Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Stark Ravings  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In
100 unsexiest men 2009

The guns of Boston

Why this could be the most bullet-riddled summer in 15 years
By DAVID S. BERNSTEIN  |  July 6, 2006

$200 TOWARD YOUR NEXT GUN?: A sample of the guns turned in during Mayor Menino’s recent gun buy-back program (ironically, each gun was worth a $200 gift card from Target, a store with a bulls-eye for a logo).
Three months ago, Boston was averaging a shooting a day. It is an even deadlier place to live this summer. Since the start of May there have been, on average, three victims of gunfire — fatal and non-fatal — every two days. Since June 7, that figure has inched upward to almost two a day.

More people were murdered in Boston over the past two months than in any May-to-June stretch since 1990, a year that saw the highest number of homicides in the city’s history. All told, more than 200 people have been shot in Boston this year — almost 20 percent more than in all of 2003 (the last year of quiet before the current upsurge began).

And summer is just beginning; the rain is finally clearing and school has just let out. It’s no wonder, then, that residents are sending their kids to live with relatives for the warm season. Summer 2006 looks to be bloody.

A Phoenix examination of the 150-plus shootings and stabbings since May 1 shows just how widespread and fluid the violence has become within affected communities. The Codman Square area, which was quiet over the winter, has recently exploded with gunfire, as have other hot spots, including Fayston Street, in Roxbury; the intersection of Bowdoin Street and Geneva Avenue, in Dorchester, and Blue Hill Avenue between Morton and Walk Hill Streets, in Mattapan.

But here’s the rub: overall violence and crime are not on the rise. The number of shooting victims during the past 10 weeks is twice as high as it was during the same period last year, yet the total number of aggravated assaults is actually lower, as are the number of rapes, robberies, burglaries, larcenies, and vehicle thefts. In fact, other than a relatively small increase in aggravated assaults over the past three years, all major crime categories have either remained stable or declined, while the number of gunfire victims has tripled.

This fact — that crime and violence are not rising, but shootings are — deserves much more recognition than it has received. It tells us that the dramatic change in the past three years is not that more young men are turning to violence and crime. It is that they are more often armed and ready to fire.
The problem here is guns.

A new study from the Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy at Duke University, published in the summer issue of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, finds a national truism indicative of Boston’s current situation. “Gun prevalence has a more-or-less neutral effect on other crimes, including assault and robbery,” the authors write in the paper, “Aiming for Evidence-Based Gun Policy.” “Guns do not affect the overall volume of violence, but do affect its intensity.”

Indeed. Three of the city’s 12 police districts, covering much of Roxbury, Dorchester, and Mattapan, account for half of this year’s aggravated assaults and recent stabbings, but three-quarters of the city’s shootings and homicides. Even without considering the scores of serious, often debilitating, injuries, and the extraordinary fear that gunfire spreads among innocent residents — especially when police leave more than 90 percent of those shooters on the streets — it’s apparent the area is wracked by violence. “There is no counterpart with other weapons to driveby shootings and stray bullets,” the authors of the Duke study write. So the problem is clear: those three districts are overflowing with guns.

Case in point, other seemingly violent neighborhoods have been spared death and trauma because even the most violent criminals in those areas don’t carry handguns. East Boston has a violence problem, with a dozen stabbings in the past two months, for instance. And South Boston, Charlestown, and downtown Boston — especially Chinatown — are experiencing a frightening rise in drug-related violence, says City Councilor Michael Ross, who chaired a Special Committee on Youth Violent Crime Prevention that issued its report earlier this month. Yet those neighborhoods aren’t seeing surging homicide rates. In fact, just five percent of assaults in such places involve firearms.

Yet in the three gun-violence hot spots, Roxbury, Dorchester, and Mattapan, assaults are four times more likely to involve guns — that’s 20 percent of all 2005 assaults, up from 15 percent in 2004 — leaving people dead in the streets, and others huddling fearfully inside.

“It’s almost like a tale of two cities,” says Ross.

Unfortunately, it’s one thing to recognize — as Mayor Thomas Menino and others do — that Boston’s problem lies with the prevalence of guns on its streets. It’s another thing to fix that problem. This much is clear, however: efforts now under way won’t do it.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Death by handguns, Media Moses, A cop with an assitude, More more >
  Topics: News Features , Boston Police Department, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Burglary,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
The guns of Boston
You wrote that illegal buyers would favor the, "hot-selling Sig Sauer Mosquito, with adjustable sites and sliding ambidextrous safety — perfect for the southpaw gangbanger." Maybe you're not too familiar with guns and shouldn't really be writing about them. The Mosquito is a .22 rimfire target pistol, too big to conceal easily and at the bottom of the power scale of handguns.
By bigiron on 07/11/2006 at 9:48:14
The guns of Boston
>> So one way to curtail demand is to intensify the downsides of illegal gun-ownership, in any number of ways. But attempts to increase liability — more arrests for gun possession, for instance — have failed to change behavior. So it sounds like you believe in the law of supply and demand. Here's an idea- increase the supply of guns to law abiding residents so that they can protect themselves, decrease the threats of being raked through the muck for criminal acts such as shooting a home invader or burglar looking for an illegal gun. How many of the guns used in violence as mentioned in your article were owned legally? How many legal guns would be stolen if burglar knew the risk of getting shot dead while trespassing in the middle of the night in someones home was over 50%? How would you feel about having more police protection available to patrol your community because legal law abiding citizens weren't forced to telephone them and wait for action, but could actually help make their neighborhoods safer by removing a criminal from the streets? The way I see it, this experiment in gun legislation is a failure, and instead of looking at the evidence- that these gun crimes are not committed using legally registered guns by legal gun owners, people look at the roundabout arguement- but a legal gun is one that can be snatched. The real problem is violence. If someone wants to be violent, the tool they have at hand is almost immaterial. We need to either keep people from desiring to be violent or remove the violent people. Gun control not only misses the point completely, it is a waste of resources and makes the problem worse.
By OCP on 07/14/2006 at 2:40:35

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   IS IT TIM TIME?  |  April 01, 2009
    As Deval Patrick flails, Tim Cahill is positioning himself to run. And that's a-okay with the Patrick team.
  •   TONE DEAF  |  March 25, 2009
    Can Gov. Deval hear the thunder of jeers?
  •   CRACKING UP  |  March 19, 2009
    State legislators across the country are filing resolutions declaring state sovereignty  just as they did the last time a Democrat won the White House
  •   CAPUANO CORNERED?  |  March 03, 2009
    Could a developing Washington probe hurt the Somerville congressman, and derail his Senate hopes?
  •   YOUTH INFUSION  |  February 19, 2009
    The surprisingly diverse leaders of team DeLeo. Plus, do environmentalists have reason to worry?

 See all articles by: DAVID S. BERNSTEIN

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group