The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
Features  |  Reviews
Find a Movie
Movie List
Loading ...
Find Theaters and Movie Times
Search Movies

Kael? Sarris?

The critics convene at the Coolidge
By GERALD PEARY  |  October 31, 2007

Pauline Kael

“Kael was a presence, a factor in how many of us do our jobs,” argued’s Stephanie Zacharek. Entertainment Weekly’s Owen Gleiberman agreed: “She was the Elvis, or the Beatles, of film criticism.”

When he was a student, Gleiberman added, he wrote a fan note to Kael, and she wrote back. “It was like God had sent me a letter.”

“I think the time is ripe for a guerrilla attack on Pauline,” answered David Sterritt, president of the National Society of Film Critics. This was the most argumentative anyone got. Sterritt went on, “I honestly think more people were influenced by Andy Sarris than Pauline Kael. He was always writing about interesting directors I’d never heard of, and ‘B’ movies, and spectacles.” The LA Weekly’s Scott Foundas nominated Manny Farber for Most Important Critic consideration, and Premiere magazine’s Glenn Kenny brought up Robin Wood, the British critic who has lived for decades in Toronto.

At its most fossilized, when nine voices droned on, unchecked, about some dimly interesting film-critic concern, “Beyond Thumbs Up” resembled that most deadening playing field of discourse, an academic conference. Yawn and snore! But that wasn’t often: critics are far wittier, and a hundred times less earnest, than most college profs I know. So much of the two days of discussion proved flavorful because film critics are interesting thinkers with insightful things to say about their profession. For instance:

Ty Burr of the Boston Globe: “I have to be cognizant at the Globe that I have all kinds of readership. Some like movies, some don’t, some take their kids. I try to address the consumer audience in the first couple of paragraphs of a review. Then I can go on to an audience who cares about culture and, in the back half, try to explain the film to myself.”

Phillip Lopate, author of American Movie Critics: “I want to speak against the notion of risk and edginess, [the idea] that the subversive, the transgressive, is always what’s important. If I put up Lubitsch, Ford, Mizoguchi versus the edginess of Altman and Scorsese, I’d take the first group. I want a film to show sublimity, to have wisdom, compassion, and a visual rigor. Not 10 styles, one style.”

Armond White of the New York Press: “I consider myself a pop-culture kid, always interested in what’s new. But I’m not always taken in by what’s new.”

Scott Foundas: “Seriousness is a great liability in our culture. The critical voice has less influence today than ever. Local critics are put on other beats, put out to pasture. I get e-mails all the time at the LA Weekly from young critics, and I often try them out with a freelance review. You can still get your foot in the door. But I tell them also: [for a profession as a film critic,] there’s no future.”

Related: Vitus, Flashbacks: June 9, 2006, The hub of film criticism?, More more >
  Topics: Film Culture , Elvis Presley, Entertainment, Movies,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
HTML Prohibited
Add Comment

Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVIEW: CREATION  |  January 20, 2010
    God-fearing creationists won't find anything to worry them in Jon Amiel's stiff, stodgy, PBS-style telling of the life of Charles Darwin (Paul Bettany) during the time he was writing (slowly, very slowly) The Origin of Species .
  •   REVIEW: POLICE, ADJECTIVE  |  January 20, 2010
    Down these mean Romanian streets, in the nowhere town of Vaslui, walks a young plainclothes policeman, Cristi (Dragos Bucur), who seems more reasonable, more compassionate, than his stern, by-the-book colleagues.
  •   REVIEW: LE COMBAT DANS L'ÎLE  |  December 22, 2009
    Alan Cavalier's sleek noir rescued from 1962 obscurity
  •   REVIEW: AMARCORD  |  December 16, 2009
    In memory, Federico Fellini's 1973 work, an Oscar winner for Best Foreign Film, stands among his masterpieces. But seen today, Amarcord is something of a disappointment, clever and moving in places, but also sprawling, undisciplined, clumsy in patches, and decidedly overlong.
  •   REVIEW: ARAYA  |  December 16, 2009
    Margot Benacerraf's extraordinary Venezuelan documentary, among the finest ever made, shared the 1959 International Critics Prize at Cannes with Alain Resnais's Hiroshima, mon amour and then disappeared.

 See all articles by: GERALD PEARY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group