LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

The amazing race

December 26, 2007 9:48:16 AM

pages: 1 | 2 | 3

The Republicans, on the other hand, have votes in Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina, Florida, and Maine — meaning that the candidates might split up to concentrate on states most amenable to them, in hopes of staying viable until February 5.

KEY DATES Michigan primary, January 15; South Carolina primaries, January 19 (Republican) and 26 (Democrat); Florida primary, January 29

PREDICTION For the Republicans, South Carolina and Florida turn into two-man contests between Huckabee and McCain, eliminating any other candidates not named Giuliani. Clinton wins South Carolina, setting up a Clinton-Obama national showdown.

ELIMINATED Thompson and Romney

Leg 3: Delegate counting (February 5 thrOugh March 31)
Up until February 5, the votes are purely for positioning. Beginning that day, it’s all about the delegates.

And it’s largely about that one day. More than 20 states have opted to hold their primaries or caucuses that Tuesday, the earliest allowed by the two parties for all but a few states. More than 2000 Democratic Party delegates will be chosen that day, of 4417 total. Republicans will select 1081 of their 2516 delegates.

The Republican process is particularly tilted toward national front-running candidates, thanks to the winner-take-all delegate-award rules for most state primaries, including California, New York, New Jersey, and Ohio. A string of solid second-place finishes is a sure-fire strategy for elimination.

With the enormous expense of campaigning in so many big states, expect candidates to concede some contests and focus on others. (And, to try to do more through free media — candidates will be thankful that Jay Leno, Conan O’Brien, Jimmy Kimmel, and possibly David Letterman are returning to book them as guests.) This may cause a regionalizing of the results. For the GOP, Huckabee may do well in the seven Southern states voting that day (as might Thompson, as a last gasp, if he’s still in it); Giuliani might win New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut; McCain might do best in California, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah (as might Romney in his last shot, if he hasn’t dropped out yet). For the Democrats, Clinton might carry the coasts while Obama sweeps the South — or vice versa.

The delegate counts coming out of Super Tuesday will give us front-runners seeking to reach the key clinching numbers (2209 for Democrats, 1259 for Republicans) through February and early March — and possibly beyond.

KEY DATES Super Tuesday, February 5; Maryland and Virginia primaries, February 12; Ohio and Texas primaries, March 4

PREDICTION McCain wins most states, Huckabee pulls out a few, and Giuliani recovers to do well in the tri-state area. The Democrats tip toward Clinton.

ELIMINATED Edwards

071228_3rdparty_main
Leg 4: The Great Lull (April 1 through August 24)
The two nominees should be known by early March at the latest. But the public doesn’t resume paying attention to the race until the party nominating conventions in late summer. That’s six months in which the media has dedicated massive resources to cover a presidential race in which nobody is interested.

This guarantees three things: 1) anything that the nominees say or do (or that anyone says about them) will be covered as though it is an outbreak of plague; 2) coverage of anything that happens in the world will focus on how it theoretically affects the presidential race; 3) any Tom, Dick, or Harry can get massive media attention by using the word “president.”

On this third point, look for authors and filmmakers to take advantage of the great lull — Michael Moore released Fahrenheit 911 during the 2004 lull, while Richard Clarke, Bob Woodward, and Bill Clinton all published presidency-related best-sellers. Even the 9/11 Commission Report, published July 22 of that year, became a best-seller.

Third-party candidacies — real or rumored — will heat up during these months, necessitated by the summer deadlines to get on the ballot in each state, but fanned by media boredom. Ross Perot emerged during the 1992 lull. The 2000 lull saw the Green Party team up with Ralph Nader, and rumors of Donald Trump and Warren Beatty candidacies floating through the press.

This year, all eyes — and dozens of reporters — will watch every move of Nader’s, Michael Bloomberg’s, Lou Dobbs’s, Ron Paul’s, and anyone else who issues even the slightest hint of interest in an independent run.

And if we’re lucky, a third party will provide the level of meaningless entertainment that the remnants of Perot’s Reform Party gave us in the summer of 2000, when the fight for the party’s guaranteed federal resources led to a televised spectacle of bickering, feuding, and lawsuits. Actual headline of June 23, 2000: REFORM PARTY HOPEFUL [PAT] BUCHANAN COURTS MUSLIM VOTE.

On a more relevant note, arcane stories can take on huge significance during the great lull. The leak of Valerie Plame’s identity surfaced as a political issue when she testified to Congress in March 2004. In 2000, Cuban refugee Elián González became a political issue, and stayed in the headlines for four months, when Gore broke with the Clinton administration on its handling.

KEY DATES Could be any time


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
COMMENTS

Anyone interested in what Huckabee is really like face to face should try this funny (but it actually happened) column: //goupstate.us/index.php/lanefiller/2007/11/02/title_14

POSTED BY lanefiller AT 12/27/07 12:26 AM
The Clinton camp has recently charged their candidate is being held to a higher standard than the rest of the field, and Ms. Clinton may have point. In a study recently released by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, coverage of the 2008 Presidential Campaign "in the early months of the 2008 presidential campaign, ... had already winnowed the race to mostly five candidates and offered Americans relatively little information about their records or what they would do if elected", according to the comprehensive review of election coverage across the media. "The press also gave some candidates measurably more favorable coverage than others. Democrat Barack Obama, the junior Senator from Illinois, enjoyed by far the most positive treatment of the major candidates during the first five months of the year?followed closely by Fred Thompson, the actor who at the time was only considering running", the study continued. "Meanwhile, the tone of coverage of the two party front runners, New York Senator Hillary Clinton and former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, was virtually identical, and more negative than positive", according to the study. In all, 63% of the campaign stories focused on political and tactical aspects of the campaign. That is nearly four times the number of stories about the personal backgrounds of the candidates (17%)or the candidates' ideas and policy proposals (15%). And just 1% of stories examined the candidates'records or past public performance", the study found. TONE OF COVERAGE Percent of All Stories Positive Negative Hillary Clinton 26.9 37.8 Barack Obama 46.7 15.8 Rudy Giuliani 27.8 37.0 John McCain 12.4 47.9 Perhaps this is why we've found a collision of "chilled sensuality and violent hilarity".

POSTED BY jeffery mcnary AT 12/31/07 4:03 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR
  • NO SIDE BETS:   The governor’s gaming legislation crapped out, but are casinos still alive in a compromise? Plus, a school-budget crisis could start a political firestorm.
  • WHITHER THE GOP?:   With Democrats in total control of state government, the Massachusetts GOP should be a rising voice of dissent. Instead, it seems more impotent than ever.
  • MORE THAN A FEW LOOSE ENDS:   BPD to review Cowans evidence
  • OBAMA OUTSIDE THE BOOM:   The first political leader of my generation acts nothing like the rest of us — which might be how he’s gotten where he is
  • IG REPORT ON STATE SENATE PREZ TAKES A CONVENIENT DIVE:   Fails to deal with tourism controversy
  • FRAMED?:   The Boston Police investigation of Stephan Cowans led to a wrongful conviction. Was it incompetent — or corrupt?
  • CASH CAROUSEL:   Many things changed this year on Beacon Hill, but not the power of the almighty dollar
  • CAN OBAMA LASSO THE BAY STATE?:   Once considered sure Clinton country, the Massachusetts primary is now a shootout
  • EXCLUSIVE: CALIFORNIA GLEAMING:   Romney gains on McCain in crucial Golden State contest; Clinton's lead holds steady
  • MADAM MAYOR MAUREEN?:   While everyone was distracted by the New Hampshire primary, did City Council President Maureen Feeney step into the race for mayor?

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group