LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS | NEWS | MUSIC | MOVIES | DINING | LIFE | ARTS | REC ROOM | CLASSIFIEDS | VIDEO

Power play

Is Cicilline trying to remake the City Council? A department head’s incipient run against an East Side incumbent raises eyebrows
February 9, 2006 2:15:07 AM

AUPPER HAND While 8-7 splits were common during Cianci's latter years in office, Cicilline has enjoyed success in plucking council votes.fter supplanting Vincent A. “Buddy” Cianci Jr. almost four years ago as the 800-pound gorilla of Providence politics, Mayor David N. Cicilline — who seems a sure bet for reelection, at least at this point — continues to trumpet an agenda of civic reform and economic development. But a looming challenge to a longtime city councilor on Providence’s East Side, by a ranking member of Cicilline’s administration, is sparking questions about whether the mayor is making a Machiavellian move to consolidate power by remaking the City Council this year. While other explanations are possible, the situation could also point to the future day when Cicilline may represent Rhode Island Democrats’ best hope for retaking the governor’s office.

Cliff Wood, the director of Providence’s Department of Arts, Culture, and Tourism, would represent the closest thing to an automatic council vote for Cicilline. At the same time, Wood’s anticipated Democratic match-up against Ward Two Councilor Rita M. Williams, who has held the seat representing the College Hill, Blackstone, and Wayland neighborhoods for 15 years, is particularly striking since Williams has been a strong supporter of the mayor. The currently imprisoned Cianci, who made a practice not just of punishing his enemies, but also screwing his friends, might appreciate the irony.

Wood declined comment on whether he is even considering a council run, and Cicilline says he is not encouraging any challenges, including one by Wood, to incumbent councilors. “I have a pretty hard and fast rule that I will focus on my own election,” says Cicilline, who could go without a serious opponent this year. While he wouldn’t rule out the possibility of soliciting candidates for an open seat, the mayor says it is the responsibility of the residents in particular wards to select their councilors. Recalling his own experience in being advised against running for the state Senate and for mayor, Cicilline adds, “I certainly don’t discourage people from running for public office.”

Such neutral notes notwithstanding, word of Wood’s incipient campaign is starting to percolate throughout Providence. Although some may exaggerate Cicilline’s role in seeking challengers to council incumbents, it’s hard not to suspect that the mayor and Wood are on the same page. Wood, after all, was working for philanthropist and downtown developer Arnold “Buff” Chace — an enthusiastic supporter of Cicilline’s 2002 campaign — when he became an active campaign volunteer, and the mayor tabbed Wood to join his administration, as deputy chief of policy, after he won election. Cicilline promoted Wood in November 2003, moving him into the newly created arts’ czar post in November 2003.

Ward Three Councilor Kevin Jackson (Mount Hope) is among those taking a keen interest in the talk of a Williams-Wood match-up. On one hand, he says, “I don’t know if the mayor has anything to do with it.” Yet on the other hand, Jackson asks, “Why would he [Wood] be positioning himself to run against someone who’s been a supporter of the mayor?” Asked to answer his own question, Jackson says he suspects “it has to do with how the mayor feels he has a mandate,” and may want “15 [council] people who march in line with 100 percent of what he wants.” Like several other councilors, Jackson says this would raise the prospect of “dictatorship,” rather than the desirable give-and-take between an executive and a legislative body.

Cicilline describes a normal state of affairs. He calls his relations with the City Council “good. There’s always a natural tension between a legislative and an executive branch.” The way in which relations with some members are better than with others “is the nature of politics,” he says. Referring to the generally large amount of agreement with the council, and sporadic disagreements, the mayor says, “I don’t know that it’s that different from other cities.” Cicilline dismisses talk of a possible power grab, suggesting that uniform mayoral support on the council isn’t realistic — or necessarily healthy.

The remarks coming from Jackson, though, are particularly telling. Although he has been Cicilline’s staunchest council ally, Jackson, the chair of the Finance Committee, played a key role when the council recently dealt the mayor his first rejection on a nomination, and relations have chilled between the two men. Since informing the mayor that he had a problem with Kas R. DeCarvalho’s nomination as chairman of the Zoning Board of Review, Jackson says, “he [Cicilline] hasn’t spoken with me.” As a result, the councilor says, “I don’t know what their game plan is now, even with me. I’m a little — afraid is not the word — but not sure. It’s like a chess game where I don’t know what the next move is.”


pages: 1 | 2 | 3
COMMENTS

No comments yet. Be the first to start a conversation.

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password

MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2008 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group