LISTINGS |  EDITOR'S PICKS |  NEWS |  MUSIC |  MOVIES |  DINING |  LIFE |  ARTS |  REC ROOM |  THE BEST |  CLASSIFIED

World of pain

February 10, 2006 3:01:12 PM

pages: 1 | 2

Denunciations of the Islamofascists are certainly welcome, but they are too few and too far between. The Islamic world is one where theocracy, not liberty, is the watchword. Women are oppressed, gays are executed, and freedom of speech is unknown or severely restricted. Witness the repeated calls for the destruction of Israel if you want to view the face of Islamic intolerance.

But hypocrisy is rampant everywhere. Over the past 20 years Western democracies have significantly weakened the institution of free speech by adopting so-called hate-crime laws. These laws criminalize speech that, for example, denies the existence of the Holocaust. As reprehensible as those vile opinions may be, the people who hold them should not be imprisoned as they have been in France and Germany. Great Britain has recently adopted watered-down but still restrictive codes that make it more difficult to criticize the religion of others. Too many American campuses are ruled by speech codes that seek to cleanse discourse from what is not only vulgar and socially unacceptable, but also that is deemed politically incorrect according to institutional standards of received opinion. Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News operation has tried to bully American corporations that adopted the benign and inclusive “Happy Holidays” greeting into accepting the Christian but restrictive “Merry Christmas.” The Republican Party that effectively controls all three branches of government subtly and not so subtly promotes various schemes favorable to organized religion in the face of opposition among those who don’t believe in a deity, or don’t believe that others should be forced to believe. And then there is Turkey, that Asian nation that wants to join the European Union: it is prosecuting perhaps its most internationally well-known novelist for national slander for daring to recognize the genocide the Turks visited on the Armenians. The Armenians, who understandably do not want the world to forget the horrors inflicted on them, themselves maintain a brutal and repressive regime. The irony of all this is so intense as to be painful.

___

On the Web:

View the cartoons: //www.brusselsjournal.com/node/698


pages: 1 | 2
COMMENTS

Well put.

POSTED BY yo momma AT 02/08/06 12:14 PM
I disagree with your stance not to run these pictures. Why not put it out in the open so that there can be dialogue about what Muslims do or don't find acceptable.

POSTED BY Veector AT 02/08/06 12:16 PM
I also disagree with your decision, which I suspect is more out of fear than respect.  You see, a lot of our ancestors struggled, died and worked hard to get freedom of speech.  Guess you like the old days before it existed better.

POSTED BY pussnboots
At least you are being honest about your fears of retribution against your employees. Indeed it is that this may be the 'darkest moment in [your] 40-year publishing history', but for different reasons than you state. Your paper has just capitulated to intimidation. Gosh, maybe you should re-think your stance on 'abortion clinic bombers' or the Aryan Nation. I am sure that during your '40-year publishing history' you bravely held murdered Denver talk-radio icon Alan Berg as the freedom-loving, hard-hitting person that he truly was. Is there a jourlanist left in your sorry publication? Where is any defiance you might muster against people who would kill you and your family and broadcast your screaming convulsions in the name of their religion? And then you figure, well, in this case, we just don't want to make these people mad? They are mad. It is not our fault. Can you admit it is not our fault? Naaa...must be our fault. Always is. When our children are as old as we are now...how will they view what we did today? --sitswithdogs

POSTED BY sitswithdogs AT 02/10/06 9:52 PM
Normally I pay little attention to pop-culture, but i was waiting for some friends and your publication was on the bar so I read your editorial on being intimidated by muslim fanatics. Very weak argument.Not that pop culture news organizations have much ingterity to begin with, but you've clearly show you have no integrity at all. If you cared so much about your employees, you may want to consider the example you set by whimping out and taking politically correctness to the ultimate extreme. Pathetic.

POSTED BY providence AT 02/11/06 3:14 AM
The Jyllands-Posten editors didn't know about about the prohibition against pictures of the prophet? Please. I'm sure they didn't expect the response to be as insane as it has, but don't just parrot the WSJ on this, think about it. They solicited these cartoons with the intention of insulting Muslims. If you solicited "satiric" cartoons of Moses or Jesus, you wouldn't be surprised if someone got pissed. The violent reaction is completely wrong, but don't portray the instigators as wide-eyed innocents.

POSTED BY jose.hipants AT 02/11/06 2:13 PM
I cannot believe some of the drivel that is being posted here.. First of all.. since when have Muslims have the 'right' not to be offended? Where were you 'sensitive' people when Mary was portrayed in dung, and Jesus as 'piss Christ'? did you see Christians burning and rioting?..Do NOT equate insult with the right to burn and riot.. Cartoons don't equal burning embassies in the Real World.. I am totally Ashamed of the Phoenix for bowing down to the terrorists and that is Exactly what they did. Read history you cowards that is how the Muslims almost took over the world the first time.. If you do not have the guts to do more than go after Presidents et al, who cannot fight back you do not DESERVE to have a paper!

POSTED BY chronos222 AT 02/11/06 8:25 PM
What ever happened to "speaking truth to power"? Obviously, the power Islamofascists wield - that of fear - is real. If pussilanimity is ascendant even here, what is the value of a free people to the world? And yet you continue to decry a loss of freedom to our government: I decry the loss of courage in your hearts. Your 'About Us' page states that you "work together to reach people who share a similar lifestyle". It appears that lifestyle is now provably, soft, self-centered, and ultimately decadent. Good job.

POSTED BY A.Nonymoose AT 02/12/06 3:32 PM
Like any other newspaper the Phoenix is a business. If the Phoenix printed the cartoons they would likely be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars for increased physical security. Also consider the litigous nature of the USA; if a newpaper published these cartoons now after all the violence which has occured in majority Islamist countries, and the paper's office suffered a homicidal terrorist attack, it is very likely that paper would be sued by victims or their survivors, especially ones who weren't employees.

POSTED BY SayNoToIslam AT 02/12/06 7:55 PM
The Boston Phoenix can hang its head in shame again. I remember the editorial where your paper "had the courage" to post the video of Daniel Pearl's murder and then justify that on the editorial page too: //www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/editorial/documents/02299081.htm This newspaper has gone beyond hypocracy.

POSTED BY Rorschach AT 02/13/06 2:53 PM
Tea party? You are spineless weasels to not shove it in the face of a most dangerous and rancid cult masquerading as a religion. WWIV is here; most media be it mainstream or backstreet hasn't a clue.

POSTED BY Gryphon AT 02/13/06 5:43 PM
We knew without your saying it that you gave in from fear. I am ashamed to be an American watching the cowardly response of the US media. And these are such mild cartoons! You are just asking for more. The more you appease the more is asked of you. You are setting a horrible precedent. You also have no credibility when it comes to any reporting you do on the ME, Islam, or Islamic terrorism. We know that what will be most important to you is making sure no one gets mad, not reporting the truth. Non-Muslims have no obligation to Islamic law! Shame on you!!!

POSTED BY pat AT 02/14/06 10:09 AM
Phoenix Pholds.... WOW! What a disapointment to see and read your..tiny....headline and cowardly, sentimental article in last weeks paper! Are you going to cut back on your brutal depictions of this country's current leaders and religious organizations via articles and cartoons? Maybe your tabloid should get out of the political relm all together, because you folded under the umbrella of free speech that I thought you live by...or now...die by. Your editors curled up in the fetal position and started sucking their thumbs like Loyd (played by Jim Carey) in Dumb and Dumber while SeaBass (Cam Neeley) stood over him in the toilet stall ready to fuck him in the ass or mouth or both! In these trying times we need courage. We are taking our lumps from the Radical Islammofascistwhatevers.. and will continue to do so. Unless we intend to lie down like The Boston Phoenix addmittedly did last week. Signed, A changed forever reader... Josh from Ipswich

POSTED BY Josh from Ipswich AT 02/15/06 10:26 PM
If you really wanted to make a statement about the censorship you feel is being imposed on you by the threat of violence by Islamic radicals there is another way you could go about it while still demonstrating the power of free speech. Print the Danish cartoons of Mohammed. Print cartoons mocking Jesus. Print cartoons mocking Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Whites, Blacks, Orientals, Men, Women, Gays, Straights, Democrats, Republicans, old people, young people, etc. Print them all in one issue and then see who cries the loudest. If you did this you could at least have a claim to fairness and you would also amply demonstrate what real free speech is. Your editorial is good because you frankly spelled out the reasons for not publishing the cartoons - but backing down is not free speech - the absence of freedom that is imposed by threat of violence will only serve to demonstrate to those who try to impose it that they can get away with their threats.

POSTED BY jdwil44 AT 02/19/06 11:59 AM
Three questions: 1. Did you report the threats to law enforcement? 2. If you didn't, why not...I mean, there were actual serious threats ("we feel forced, literally, to bend to maniacal pressure"), right...? 3. If so, what was law enforcement's response and did it affect your decision not to publish the cartoons?

POSTED BY gs AT 02/19/06 7:19 PM
It is good to see that the Phoenix is willing to admit that it is willing to fight for "free speech" as long as it involves no fighting. Enjoy your cowardice and the rights that were granted to you by those willing to defend liberty from earlier despots like Hitler and Stalin and who gave their lives to keep us free. All of you should hang your heads in shame and find work more suitable to your abilities, like making white flags for the French. You are an embarassment to the nation, even if you are honest about your cowardice. Now go back to your puffery about anything, knowing that you have as much credibility as a Madam at a whorehouse preaching about the virtues of chastity.

POSTED BY Jack Adams AT 02/20/06 1:01 PM
The reason given in the editorial about not wanting to offend Muslims is a bunch of baloney. Devout Muslims have made pictures of Mohammed for centures without any uproar. See //www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/ Where was all the indignation at 9/11? Or when the children were murdered in Russia? Why wasn't a $1M bounty put on the head of any terrorist who participated in the attacks? What this is really about is fear. And the Phoenix should be congratulated for calling a spade a spade. What the Communists and the Nazis were never able to do in this country -- silence the free press -- the Muslims have succeeded in doing.

POSTED BY SFH AT 02/20/06 2:23 PM

Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password


MOST POPULAR

 VIEWED   EMAILED 

ADVERTISEMENT

BY THIS AUTHOR

PHOENIX MEDIA GROUP
CLASSIFIEDS







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2007 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group