Sign up for Friends With Benefits
The Phoenix
Search The Site
     
Last updated on Sunday, November 12, 2006 5:16 AM                            Search powered by Google
View Phoenix Listings
LISTINGS
LISTINGS
NEWS
MUSIC
MOVIES
FOOD
LIFE
ART + BOOKS
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
MOONSIGNS

Sex (Circa 2006)

pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
8/2/2006 4:57:01 PM

But Ella isn’t exactly a prude. She describes herself as being “notoriously blunt and to the point about sex”; she was the first among her close friends to shed her virginity, at 19, to a New Hampshire boy she was dating in her freshman year of college. Since then, she’s slept with six different people, but they were nearly all either close friends or boyfriends. (She tends to hook up with her male pals. “I have exactly one male friend I’m close to whom I have not made out with.”) Ella’s mom is gay, but she’s never experimented with girls. “Sorry to be dull, but I was harassed way too much about how I must be gay ’cause my mom is. So I’ve been quite the nice straight girl.”

Ella once had to get tested for an STD because of a scare (all tests came back negative), so she vigilantly encourages protected sex. She’s always offering condoms to friends, and she leaves them on her desk in case her housemates need them. But she admits that she’s stopped using them since she’s been in a yearlong relationship with a Boston-area boyfriend. She doesn’t really like how they feel. “The two people I think of as sucking in bed ... I had sex with them using condoms.”

The (reformed) collector
SM, 30, 60+ previous partners

Mike doesn’t mean to sound like a porn star, but the Allston-based musician swears he can’t remember how many women he’s slept with since he lost his virginity 12 years ago. “It’s in the low 60s, but — and I don’t mean this to sound like a Ron Jeremy thing — I just don’t remember everybody’s name, so it’s hard to have an accurate count.”

When Mike reflects on his formerly promiscuous tendencies, his explanation calls to mind a Revenge of the Nerds subplot. “I used to get ‘Faggot this, faggot that’ called to me a lot in high school.” So he flung himself crotch first in exactly the opposite direction. “As Neanderthal as it is, [being promiscuous is] kind of showing them. The dudes that were supposed to be all macho have no idea — just no idea — the life I’ve led.”

The life he led never included more than three different partners in a day; there was usually one but frequently two. “I would often not end up going to sleep wherever I woke up. I had many toothbrushes in Boston.” He also didn’t distinguish between oral or genital partners. “Honestly, the recent phenomenon of kids not considering oral sex real sex just boggles my mind,” he offers. For the record, he estimates that he’s had between 12 and 15 anal-sex partners.


ADVERTISEMENT



Mike describes himself as “solidly lame looking,” but says one reason women so often got naked with him was because he came across as both cocksure and humanly flawed. “I’m very confident when I meet a girl. And then you let the tiniest bit of vulnerability slip out — it’s not intentional, it just tends to happen.” And he continued to be successful for the same reasons the scorpion got a ride across the river from the frog: he never promised to be anything other than what he was. “I was the least trustworthy person I knew, so girls would just skip it and not try to trust me. That’s not to say I wasn’t fun to be around.”

But Mike calmed down when he turned 30. “I look at my parents, who made an awesome life, and I want that now. I want a wife, and want to be a dad to a kid like my dad was to me, and a house with a yard.... Either that or keep hooking up at the Middle East till I’m really old and pathetic and sleeping in a shitty apartment with posters everywhere. It’s no contest.”

Mike is in a committed, monogamous relationship with a woman he calls “stone gorgeous,” “bright,” and “curvy” — he wants to keep certain distinguishing details vague for fear of  publicly embarrassing her. He still has an insatiable sexual appetite, he admits. He just deals with it differently. “Jesus, if you knew what went on in my head.”

The happy couple
SM, 25; SF, 28; 25 previous partners (combined)

Mary and Jonathan met nearly five years ago through mutual friends. They slept in the same bed on their first date but kept to their own sides. “He’s told me since that he watched me sleep,” remembers Mary, a lithe dancer and native New Yorker. “He had to leave because he was like, ‘I am in love with this girl and I need to go.’ Then he wrote a note and put it in my shoe.”

Mary and Jonathan continued hanging out. “Our first kiss, I was like, ‘I’m done, this is huge, this is it.’ It was crazy.” Although neither one was a virgin, they didn’t consummate the relationship initially. Even before they did, Jonathan asked Mary, who’d been planning to leave for New York, to be his girlfriend. “He said, ‘We’ll deal with New York when it gets here, but what we have is too awesome to not do something about,’ and I was like, ‘Yeah you’re right.’ Then we were like, ‘This is really kind of cool that we haven’t had sex.’ ”


pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
  Change Text Size


 VIEWED EMAILED COMMENTED




I just can't believe that sex in our society has become so impersonal. If this is really the current state of sex amongst 18-34 year old singles, the atmosphere is ripe for STDs to spread. The real problem is the uncoolness of not having sex, as if you're denying yourself something that's your right. Sex with the right person is worth waiting for.

POSTED BY Veector AT 05/31/06 9:00 AM

I disagree that sex has become impersonal. I think it's a good thing that today's youth are less sexually repressed than generations from before. Just because they seem more vocal doesn't mean that they are ripe for disease or otherwise sex-crazed whores. Sex is a good thing and I'm happy that society has seemed to outgrown the 'sex is dirty' mindset.

POSTED BY projconn AT 06/12/06 7:11 PM

One cannot say sex has or has not become impersonal; everyone treats it differently. As long as people are enjoying themselves in safe ways (not harming themselves or others), their sexual preferences and practices are natural and their own business. Granted, not everyone is safe, and that is unfortunate. But someone who fools around with twenty people in one month could be using protection while another person who has 1 partner in/for six months may not. These kinds of generalizations, assumptions, and judgemental mentalities (positive +/or negative) are unnecessary, unfair, and couldn't possibly be accurate for everyone in an entire group of people.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/21/06 2:50 PM

But that's my point, if people continue to behave in a medically risky and unsafe way, it's everyone's business, because eventually, society pays the price. Also, the attitude shift of people towards sex and how young girls and guys are anxious to lose their virginity makes sex less meaningful. Doesn't that deserve some kind of commentary? And towards the point that someone using protection is more safe than someone else, that used to be the case when just transfer of seminal fluid was enough to get you an STD, now herpes and other STDs can be spread with even just oral-to-genital contact. Celebrating or encouraging the freeness of a non-monogamous lifestyle is detrimental on so many levels.

POSTED BY Veector AT 06/26/06 10:01 AM

This all has to do with a serious lack of education about sex and it's consequences. Monogamy is not for everyone and boxing people in is just as detrimental to the human condition. Promoting abstinence, which is the preferred means of birth control for our conservative administration, is ineffective. The fact that today's youth learn sexual ideas and behavior from TV is serious cause for alarm as well as the administration's blatant disregard for research in favor of subjective morality. And that's not opinion, that's research.

POSTED BY projconn AT 06/28/06 9:02 PM

Well said.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/29/06 12:45 AM

Well said.

POSTED BY boston23 AT 06/29/06 12:45 AM

"Monogamy is not for everyone" Are you kidding? I'm not trying to promote abstinence. I'm just saying that young girls and boys, when they're ready to have sex, do it in a safe way and stick with their partner for long periods of time. I don't believe in having sex just for fun.

POSTED BY Veector AT 06/29/06 11:37 AM

Lack of education my ass. I apologize if "inappropriate" language is discouraged here; there was no ToS at registration to throw that in my face, so I'll be loose tounged for now. Let me know if it is, please. Now for my say; as a literate, non-judgemental, introvertive and "libido-less" fifteen year-old, I feel it neccesary to mention something. There is education. Fact is--when it's being taught to you in eighth grade when half the kids in the class have already "done it" , "bare back" or "under cover", by an over-weight, extremely humourful woman who, though very nice, looks like she hasn't been laid or plans to for years...Who do you think is going to listen? The education is there, it's simply unheeded. The more you try to push today's teenagers, the more they're going to turn their backs on you; they'll feel that, rather than taking them seriously and treating them like adults--which in a way, you actually are--you're trying to shelter them. Because honestly...when you were that age, wouldn't you rather listen to jimmy with the sweet talk and the killer smile than your old man? But you're right. Sex has gotten alot more like a trend or "the thing to do" than something meaningful or sacred. I pity those who don't care about it, or use it as a tool--but honestly? It's their business, and not anyone elses. Sure, you can blame the AID's epidemic on nonmonagomous teens and careless adults, but you have to think about it. Even the most careful people can catch it--it's that one time that makes the difference. And Veector--the world is moving into an odd generation that promotes oddities as much as it promotes straight-edge. The world is trying to become more "out of the box" and "free-thinking", and the fact that people with mindsets like yours exist is one of the reasons it is trying so hard. It's the age-old cycle of one generation trying to differentiate, become its own self. Sex has become a game. Sexuality has become fluid--as said in the article, I believe--and the lines and drawers and boxes or whatever you care to define the differences as, are becoming more and more blurred as time goes on. But not all teens or adults are sex-crazed fiends. It's true that the majority experiments alot more, but like I said; the lines are being blurred. And so what? If it leads to everyone really finding out who they are and feeling more comfortable about it, great. Less gay teen suicides. So, I believe this is a good thing, this...evolution. I do wish that people would be more careful, yes. But when there is the availability to protect and still have "fun", why try to hamper people in and say "monogamy only"? Hopefully, like an experimental "tween" or "teen" or even college student, this generation will discover itself, define itself, and start being more "mature" in its decisions. That's all I've got to say, but I hope you listened instead of just ruling me off as "just another teen". There are those of us that think before we act.

POSTED BY [-Scorpio-] AT 06/30/06 3:49 AM

Also, I apologize for that humongous chunk of text. This is my first time using the site, so I didn't realise it didn't recognize paragraphs.

POSTED BY [-Scorpio-] AT 06/30/06 3:51 AM

I understand your points. I can see that change is always in the wind from one generation to the next, but change is not always a good thing. When you talk about vast changes in culture, these are the types of things that can eventually lead to the disintegration of a society. I'm not just talking about sex, it's about a lot of things, but sex is one of those things. I agree that what everyone does is their own business and I'm not suggesting that there should be legislation to stop anyone from doing anything sexually in their own private lives. I'm just commenting that I feel that this kind of behavior is too risky. It doesn't matter how protected you feel, when culture relaxes and lets dangerous behavior become socially acceptable, the family suffers, society suffers. I don't see it as an out-of-the-box version of thinking vs conservativism. I see it as a "why don't we promote safe behavior" vs "glorifying our freely sexual culture because it feels good". I think that's a very irresponsible type of line to take.

POSTED BY Veector AT 07/10/06 9:38 AM

I'm glad that the people interviewed were able to come to terms with their sexuality, and that they were able to find other people who were willing to help affirm them in this way. In my case, I could not find anyone to so affirm me when I decided at the age of 33 that it was time to get the job of handing off my virginity done - despite the fact that no one had ever offered. To avoid the looming risk of suicide because of the self-perception of not being desirable to anyone, I went to a licensed brothel in Nevada. Looking back, and based on additional information and research since then, I would urge anyone else trapped in the unfotunate situation I was in, I would suggest that they instead see a surrogate. Surrogates always work together with a psychotherapist, which would have been a lot more beneficial to me than the (at first) disbelieving licensed prostitute I hired. She eventually did believe my situation of being a late-blooming virgin, but again, it would have been nice to have been affirmed from the start.

POSTED BY GentlemanBear AT 07/25/06 7:18 PM

I'm surprised you didn't mention about sagging. We've really lowered way down to our butts now at the back and pubes at the front

POSTED BY razor AT 08/04/06 8:19 PM

This is a test. <p>This is only a test</p> <p>If this were a real emergency, you would have been instructed to return to your nearest balm shelter. End of massage.

POSTED BY TwoFourFixate AT 08/26/06 5:30 PM


Login to add comments to this article
Email

Password




Register Now  |   Lost password







TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
   
Copyright © 2006 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group