The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 

Phantom of the Oprah

Letters to the Boston editor: February 24, 2006
By EDITORIAL  |  February 23, 2006

Thanks for your brave, spot-on cover story about Oprah Winfrey and her malign power (“Citizen Oprah,” February 10). Oprah is and has always been a complete sham. Generous, charitable people, as Winfrey repeatedly purports herself to be, do not live in $55 million mansions. That’s why those who can actually think for themselves (unlike the folks at CNN, apparently) pay no attention whatsoever to a single fucking thing she says or “endorses.”

Jason Roush
Cambridge

We are appalled by your recent cover art featuring Oprah. By illustrating an influential woman of color as a hyper-sexualized, Kong-esque monster, you have succeeded in making a racist, sexist statement before readers even open your pages. Congratulations. You’ve encouraged us to stop reading the Phoenix and turn on the television.

Ann Crews Melton and Molly Williams
Jamaica Plain

Editors’ note: The cover of our February 10 issue was based on the poster art for the cult classic Attack of the 50 Ft. Woman (1958).

How come no one asks whether Bill Gates (the richest man in the world), Donald Trump, George W. Bush, and other REALLY powerful people in America are “too powerful”? Is it because most of the others are white and male (and some are not famous celebrities), so you feel more comfortable with that? I wonder.

I notice the vehemence with which you commented about Oprah Winfrey’s recent response to and apology for the James Frey controversy. It is obvious that you hate Oprah and the ground she stands on. Why do you resent her power so much? At first when she stood by Frey, almost all of you in the media condemned her for supporting the embattled, lying author. Then when she admitted she had made a mistake, apologized, and took him to task for deceiving her and millions of readers, some of you accused her of bullying him just to protect her brand. As a wise businesswoman, why shouldn’t she?

I think there are some underlying racist and sexist motives for this anti-Oprah campaign. I think some white people — particularly some men who didn’t particularly care for her before anyway — squirmed at the idea of seeing a black woman on TV reprimanding and holding a white man accountable. That shift of power (based on America’s racist history) makes some people incredibly uneasy.

Many of us will tolerate some level of success in others. But if someone surpasses our wildest imagination of achievement and accomplishment, we feel inadequate about ourselves, which results in the proverbial “green envy”. If someone climbs “too high,” we feel the need to tear him/her down to make our sorry selves feel better. They say that is human nature, but one hopes that our spiritual evolvement allows us instead to be happy for others’ success (especially if the person is trying to use his/her success for some good) and to use others’ accomplishments for our own inspiration to be better.

If the media covered the lies told by US politicians and corporate America over the last few years with half of the energy they did with this story, what a wonderful country we would have. There are more critical, life-impacting issues to scrutinize. That’s what really matters — get some perspective!

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Attack of the 50-foot Oprah, Busted, Silence of the lambs, More more >
  Topics: Letters , Celebrity News, Entertainment, George W. Bush,  More more >
| More

[ 05/27 ]   "A Natural Order," photographs by Lucas Foglia  @ David Winton Bell Gallery
[ 05/27 ]   George Orwell's 1984, adapted by Nick Lane  @ Gamm Theatre
[ 05/27 ]   "2012 RISD Graduate Thesis Exhibition"  @ Rhode Island Convention Center
ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   WALL STREET REFORM THAT WILL WORK  |  May 23, 2012
    It is, in the immortal words of Yogi Berra, déjà vu all over again.
  •   WHY ELIZABETH WARREN IS RIGHT — AND WHY ROMNEY WON’T CHANGE  |  May 16, 2012
    Like an alcoholic downing nips on the drive home from court-ordered rehabilitation, JPMorgan Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, could hardly wait to once again start wildly tossing depositors' money into derivative hedge bets — the very type of irresponsible behavior that nearly brought down all of Wall Street less than four years ago.
  •   BROWN BAGS IT  |  May 09, 2012
    Republican Senator Scott Brown's vote to allow the interest on college loans to double illustrates perfectly why Brown is a clever politician, but a rotten senator.
  •   READING BETWEEN OBAMA'S LINES  |  May 02, 2012
    President Barack Obama's address to the nation from Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan may have lasted less than 11 minutes, but it has big implications.
  •   EDWARDS AND CAHILL  |  April 26, 2012
    Former US senator and Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards is on trial for violating campaign finance laws. If convicted, Edwards could spend the next 30 years in a federal prison.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2012 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group